Adding Your DNA To A Biobank Is A Noble Move -- But Is It A Wise One?

from the no-good-deed-goes-unpunished dept

One new approach to teasing apart the complex relationships between genes and common diseases such as cancer, heart disease, asthma and diabetes is by creating huge biobanks of medical data and samples. The idea is that by tracking the health and habits of very large populations across many years, and then examining their DNA, it will be possible to spot factors in common. Here's a major biobank that is shortly opening up its holdings for research:

UK Biobank recruited 500,000 people aged between 40-69 years in 2006-2010 from across the country to take part in this project. They have undergone measures, provided blood, urine and saliva samples for future analysis, detailed information about themselves and agreed to have their health followed. Over many years this will build into a powerful resource to help scientists discover why some people develop particular diseases and others do not.
Anything that brings us closer to understanding and treating diseases that affect hundreds of millions of people is obviously to be welcomed. But DNA is special: for a start, it is unique for each of us (even "identical" twins seem to have different DNA.) This has made DNA of particular interest to the police, since it appears to offer a perfect way for identifying those at a crime scene (not necessarily the perpetrators, of course.) Which raises the question: what happens when the police realize that biobanks offer a great way to get DNA they can't obtain in the usual ways?

The UK Biobank addresses this issue in its FAQ:

Will access be allowed for purposes other than health-related research?

The UK Biobank Resource has been established for health-related research that is in the public interest. Any attempts to use it for other purposes will be resisted. So, for example, insurance companies and employers will not be allowed to access the Resource to look at information, samples or test results for any identifiable participants. Nor will UK Biobank allow access by the police, security services or other law enforcement agencies, unless it is forced to do so by the courts.
Clearly the UK Biobank wants to do the right thing here, but that last phrase "unless it is forced to do so by the courts" means that the police will probably get what they want once they start invoking "terrorism" or asking us to think of the children.

And once they have a sample, they might well decide to sequence its DNA to help identify the likely hair, eye and skin color of the person concerned – and perhaps much else besides, as gene analysis techniques advance, including highly-sensitive areas such as mental and reproductive health.

Investing your DNA in a biobank might seem like a noble act today, but who knows what the payback will be in years to come?

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or, and on Google+

Filed Under: biobank, dna, privacy

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    darryl, 24 Jan 2012 @ 5:31am

    easy, dont be a criminal and dont worry -

    simple answer, DO NOT break the law, and especially in such a way that DNA would need to be used to catch you..

    What are you whinning about this time ?

    The fact that there are ways to fight crime, sure your not going to like that if crime is your method of existance.

    The police have requested and received the DNA samples of every male person in an entire town, in order to determine if any one of them was involved in a murder.

    So it does not matter at all if you think that not helping research because you are at heart a criminal (and not wanting to be caught for your crimes).

    Why are you not trying to promote the law authorities the ability to find criminals quicker, after all unless you are the criminal what do you have to worry about ?

    This is the typical attitude of the likes of masnick, dont do anything that promotes compliance with the law.

    Make it as hard and as expensive as possible for law enforcement to do their job... that way you can 'get away' with more of your own crimes.

    What motive, or logic are you using for not allowing law enforcement to use available tools to enforce the law ?

    Or just because you sign onto one of these studies, by giving your DNA up, are you somehow implicating yourself ?

    I would not care less, if the government had my DNA or not, nor would I care if they wanted to search me or my computer.

    It's called being "law abiding" and therefore not having to worry about my crimes, because I do not do crimes..

    how about you masnick ? why would you be concerned ? if law enforcement asked you for a volentary DNA sample to exclude (or include) you in a crime would you refuse ? if so why ?

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.