Heritage Foundation Says SOPA Threatens Free Speech

from the pirates? dept

We recently wrote about the somewhat surprising move that The Heritage Foundation had come out against SOPA. This was surprising mainly because the think tank was famous for being very closely aligned with the MPAA on copyright issues in the past — even to the ridiculous degree of insisting that “there is no difference between shoplifting a DVD from a store and illegally downloading a copyrighted movie from Kazaa.” However even an organization that has made that statement in the past recognizes that SOPA/PIPA aren’t actually about copyright, but about regulating the internet in dangerous ways.

The think tank has decided to speak out again about how SOPA “threatens free speech.” Much of the discussion focuses on the government’s totally bungled seizure and censorship of Dajaz1.com. It notes how ridiculously overbroad this kind of censorship is under existing law, and questions why we would want to go down the “slippery slope” of expanding those powers for the government.

Once again, when even the most strident supporters of copyright are recognizing what horrible bills SOPA and PIPA are, it makes you wonder how Congress can continue to move forward with them.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: heritage foundation

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Heritage Foundation Says SOPA Threatens Free Speech”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
24 Comments
TtfnJohn (profile) says:

Re: Re: Response to: bjupton on Dec 29th, 2011 @ 1:15am

Oh!!! You mean you get little white bags of white nose candy safely on Capitol Hill?????

Shhhhhhh, don’t say that out loud! The place would fill up with only the most ignorant, unqualified and useless people! We can’t have that!! Gotta keep some of the perks quiet, you know.

Sorry Mr Speaker. I may be out of order. But I also see it’s too late because it’s already happened.

Paul says:

wonder how ?

In my opinion there is a hidden fuel that pushes this kind of bills and it is “control” or the lack of it. And its not happening only in America it is a global phenomenon.

Internet is the only medium that offers free speech. The rest are just near images.
There is always somebody that does not want for some information to spread. We all have done something wrong in our lives and told to our selves “if only these two people would now about it…”. So what you get is “free speech” where you can talk about it but don’t shout to loud. Powerful people always wanted to suppress some information and they bribe the media to keep it or do other ugly things. In the end you will get rumors about something but not real information.
Fast forward to present and shouting something on the internet has the potential of a global audience, uuu that’s not good, that means that killing a woman at a protest in some country will not have the effect of a rumor but you get 1 – 4 videos of that happening speeding faster than a virus on a global scale. Ohh shit now we’ve don it… what do we do next ahh crap we need to get rid of this internet.

do a google search on “Death of Neda Agha-Soltan”

Anonymous Coward says:

Once again, when even the most strident supporters of copyright are recognizing what horrible bills SOPA and PIPA are, it makes you wonder how Congress can continue to move forward with them.

It’s really simple, our current government over all is expanding it’s power over us, it is expanding and consolidating. We will live in a nudged saul alinsky, cass sunstein authoritarian oligarchy.

The 4th amendment has been mostly nullified, the 1st is under attack, all we have to save us is the 2nd.

FM Hilton (profile) says:

How can Congress do this?

They’re reminded of what they’re being paid off for: re-election money.

The money talks, bullshit walks. With the obscene amounts of cash being waved in front of members, it’s no wonder they tend to forget who they’re working for.

It’s also obvious that most of them don’t read anything on the Internet, lest they become confused by the real issues with SOPA/PIPA.

All they know is what their handlers tell them.

That’s what you get when you have technologically-challenged people running the country.

Anonymous Coward says:

How Congress can move forward

… it makes you wonder how Congress can continue to move forward with them.

?Congress Ends 2011 With Record-Low 11% Approval? by Frank Newport, Gallup, Dec 19, 2011:

Annual average for 2011, 17%, also lowest in Gallup history

PRINCETON, NJ — A new record-low 11% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, the lowest single rating in Gallup’s history of asking this question since 1974. This earns Congress a 17% yearly average for 2011, the lowest annual congressional approval rating in Gallup history.

[…more…]

Gwiz (profile) says:

Re: How Congress can move forward

Approval ratings only matter when re-election time rolls around. Money is what counts in Washington.

The median net worth of members of Congress is about $913,000, compared with about $100,000 for the country at large, the Times? analysis found.

Nearly half of Congress ? 249 members ? are millionaires, while only 5 percent of American households can make the same claim.

Congress is the 1%. The rest of us are cannon fodder.

Source:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/as-americans-get-poorer-members-of-congress-get-richer/

AJBarnes says:

Good Ol' Uncle Sam

I just don’t know why you think the government will not do a good job being the police for the MPAA and RIAA. Look at the fine work they have done on Medicare, Cash for Clunkers, the Stimulus program fund distributions, Levees in New Orleans, disaster relief for Katrina, Gun running to Mexico. Why, it’s as if you didn’t think the money their paid from their lobyists is effective at all!

Yankee Infidel (profile) says:

updated list of supporters and opposers to SOPA and PIPA

Mike,

You have put together a lot of individual articles that stated which companies, organizations, and Congress critters support or oppose SOPA and PIPA as a running process as the info rolled in about them.

I think it would be good to write a summary update article listing off what we currently know as the supporters and opposers, with special notation of those who have changed sides (whether going from supporting to opposing or vice versa).

btrussell (profile) says:

Re: Re: Response to: Franklin G Ryzzo on Dec 29th, 2011 @ 2:40pm

“Read the lyrics to …@@@ @@@@@@@ @@@ @@@ by @@@@@@@@@.”

And get sued for copyright infringement? No thanks.

I have a license(I’ve purchased at least 5 over the years(any other license expire when medium it is written on deteriorates? Drivers license etc…)) for Floyds’ “Money.”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...