Did You Embed The Leaked Trailer For Dark Knight Rises On Your Blog? Under SOPA, You May Face Jail Time

from the the-dark-knight-rises,-indeed dept

You may have heard that, over the weekend, the trailer for The Dark Knight Rises was leaked (eventually leading to the official release of the trailer). As tends to happen with these kinds of things, they spread pretty quickly and the video (which, let us remember, is an advertisement for the movie) went pretty viral, and lots of people were sharing it. Now, if you're normal and clueful, this is a good thing. If you're lawyers for Warner Bros., you flip out and start sending out legal notices. Rob Sheridan received one of these notices after he included the embed of one of the videos of the trailer on his Tumblr site. He pointed out how ridiculous it is that he's getting hit for merely embedding a video, since he doesn't host it at all, and it seems like the takedown notice should have gone to the folks actually hosting the video instead. Unfortunately, it's become equally popular to go after those who link to infringing content, usually relying on 512(d)'s requirements that "information location tools" "disable access" to the material once notified. Thus, Warner Bros notifies Tumblr, and there goes the video. Personally, this seems silly. A simple link or embed should never be seen as infringing, especially when it's easy enough to go after those actually hosting the video.

That said, this whole incident should be a damn good reminder of why the felony streaming portions of SOPA in the House and S.978 (the felony streaming bill) in the Senate are pretty scary. Under those bills, Sheridan could have potentially faced many years in jail for his helping to promote this movie. Remember, the point of these bills is to make a willfully infringing "public performance" of such works a potential felony. It has to be for commercial advantage or private financial gain, but those can be broadly interpreted: if the purpose is to get people to your site and advertise yourself and your work.. that can be commercial advantage. It's willful, because everyone knew the video was leaked, and not legit at the time. But is it a public performance? Hell yes.

Courts have determined that links can be public performances, noting that:
the most logical interpretation of the Copyright Act is to hold that a public performance or display includes each step in the process by which a protected work wends its way to its audience.... Using the same approach, the court determines that the unauthorized “link” to the live webcasts that Davis provides on his website qualifies...
So forget about worrying about Justin Bieber going to jail... start worrying about merely embedding the trailer for The Dark Knight Rises.

Is this really the kind of law that America needs right now?

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    PaulT (profile), 21 Dec 2011 @ 1:26pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "It's too bad that they aren't innocent bystanders, they are people linking to and embedding something that was obtained illegally, and are attempting to profit from it"

    It's too bad that they aren't innocent bystanders, they are people connecting those illegal phone calls and are attempting to profit from them.

    It's too bad that they aren't innocent bystanders, they are people delivering those illegal parcels and are attempting to profit from them.

    It's too bad that they aren't innocent bystanders, they are people accepting those illegal anonymous classified ads and are attempting to profit from them.

    It's too bad that they aren't innocent bystanders, they are people renting cars to armed robbers and are attempting to profit from them.

    Am I doing it right?

    "The problem is that it is "post offence", which means that unless someone says "take it down", they keep running it."

    How are they to know that it's illegal otherwise, since the idiots who run the corporations can't even get it right 100% of the time?

    "They profit from it, they should be liable."

    Yes if they do so WHILE AWARE of the infringement. Hence the warning aspect of the DMCA before further prosecution. This isn't hard.

    "Paul T (you are the only one, right dickhead?)"

    Yes, twatface, I'm the only one with that initial on my surname.

    As a matter of fact, i would have no problem attaching my full name to my posts if required to, and have received numerous friend requests on Facebook and other services as a direct result of my posts here. I sadly refused (FB is mainly a way for me to keep in touch with people I know in real life), but I'm clearly not hard to track down based on the information I offer openly here. I have nothing to hide, and stand behind my opinions.

    ...and you are...?

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.