The Scale Of Money

from the spend-a-few-hours dept

No one I know puts "scale" into perspective better than Randall Munroe at xkcd. If you haven't seen the latest, you should take the time to dive into what may be his largest image ever (and he's known for creating large images) dealing with money. I warn you, though, it may suck up a lot of time as you go through it:
Money
While he's offering a poster of it for sale (along with some of his other "giant" images), I'm not sure even a poster does something like this justice, which is why he's also offering it as a "custom-printed four-poster tile pack. It comes as four individual 36"x24" posters which can be tiled on the wall, for a six-foot-wide mural view of the chart, allowing you to clearly read even the finest details." I may have to put that on my holiday wishlist.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: money, scale, xkcd


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Someantimalwareguy (profile), 22 Nov 2011 @ 5:01pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Jack Daniels Explains The Deficit

    Industrial Military complex - Karl Marx turn of phrase...No Dogma needed, much about a person can be learned by the turns of phrase they use
    Hmm, it is interesting that you would equate a term used by President Eisenhower as something related to Marxism. My how far to the right we appear to have strayed...
    37% of the total budget was social welfare... and growing the Obamacare hasn't even started yet.. Source see above post
    Yet we didn't and don't need to borrow to sustain a system that is in the black well through 2025. Are you suggesting the 22+% we spend ( and have to borrow to support) on defense, war, and material is a better use of our tax dollars?
    Proven - Reagan Tax policy worked - www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm
    You must be too young to remember Reagan and his administration. Under Reagan, taxes were actually raised and the deficit literally BLOOMED: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20030729-503544.html
    OK ill go to the Clinton Tax Level if you go back to the Gingrich Spending levels (adjusted it would put us 200 Billion in the black) - Suggested by Alan Greenspan (http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/would_you_accept_clinton_tax_r.html)
    Ah, invocation of Greenspan. After he left office and witnessed how his theories and actions helped lead to the melt-down in 2008, he simply said he was wrong. What a wonderful example of unintended consequences and how badly the Republicans with the Democrat's assistance mucked up the economy. Please do a little deeper research as it will expand your mind and world view...
    I didnt say Flat Tax I said Fair Tax which are very different, 1 is a system like the present, the other (Fair Tax) is a consumption tax, so the billionare that buys a fancy car or plan will pay much higher taxes than a janitor (that is refunded for any purchase necessary for life, food, drugs, and the like). (Fairtax.org)
    Consumption tax sounds so similar to the European VAT tax. Regardless, a consumption based tax falls disproportionately on those with the least ability to pay said taxes and only works to reduce overall consumption. Well, if people cut back on consumption they buy less goods and services which in turn leads to downsizing because of a significant drop in demand (translation: people start loosing jobs when they get layed off because people are buying less of what they make).

    Try again

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.