SOPA Will Have Grave Effects On The Health Of Hundreds Of Thousands Of Americans

from the conflating-legal-and-rogue-foreign-pharamacies dept

This is a guest post from Lee Graczyk, lead organizer of RxRights, a national coalition of individuals and organizations concerned about the high cost of U.S. pharmaceuticals.

The House Judiciary Committee today is holding a hearing to examine the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), a bill that proposes to address online copyright and trademark infringement by denying services to registrants, owners or operators of Internet sites. There has been much discussion on the technological implications of this bill, but Congress and the media have overlooked SOPA's major health implications--it would take away Americans' access to safe, affordable prescription medications from licensed, legitimate Canadian and other international pharmacies.

No one would disagree that websites illegally distributing "knock-off" goods, which include rogue online pharmacies, are a public menace. However, SOPA's definition of an Internet site that endangers public health (even worse than in its Senate counterpart, the PROTECT IP Act) is so vague and broad that safe, legitimate Canadian and other international pharmacies could be shut-down "in the dark of night."

This is because SOPA inappropriately groups together real pharmacies--licensed, legitimate pharmacies that require a doctor's prescription and sell brand-name medications--and the rogues, who sell everything from diluted or counterfeit medicine to narcotics without a prescription.

This oversight is extremely dangerous for Americans (I am one of them) who rely on legitimate Canadian and other international pharmacies to import safe, affordable prescription medications they need to survive. For example, 90,000 people in Florida alone would lose access to safe, affordable prescription medications because of SOPA.

Each year, hundreds of thousands of Americans import safe, affordable prescription drugs because they cannot afford the same brand-name medications that are sold in the U.S., which cost at least twice as much. Others refuse to pay the exorbitant costs of prescription medications when there is a more economical way that is just as safe.

The bottom line is that pharmacies accredited through organizations such as the Canadian International Pharmacy Association, Pharmacy Accreditation Services and Pharmacy Checker are the "real deal." They sell brand-name prescription medications made by top manufacturers.

A recent study by the Commonwealth Fund highlights the need for drug importation. According to the survey on health insurance coverage, a staggering 48 million Americans ages 19-64 did not fill a prescription due to cost in 2010, which represents a 66 percent increase since 2001.

Americans, especially those without insurance and seniors living on fixed incomes, should not have to make choices like whether to fill their prescriptions or buy groceries for the week. Everyone, including those in the tech community with whom we agree on the overall negative impact of SOPA, should bear in mind the severe health implications of this bill, which would affect the well-being of patients across the U.S.

If Americans don't take action to protect their right to safe and affordable medications, they could lose their access to safe, legitimate pharmacies and, therefore, vital medications they need to stay alive.

Filed Under: canada, drugs, health, healthcare, pharmacies, sopa
Companies: rxrights

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Gweedosezz, 21 Nov 2011 @ 6:29am

    Re: Re: Buy why are prescriptions dearer in the US?

    It is tuly amazing that here in the US, the same people who nall Universal Healthcare "Socialism" are at the same time protecting the biggest group of Socialists in the world, i.e., the Health Insurance industry.

    These "Socialist Dictatorships" (Insurance Companies) function on the Marxist principal of "From each according to his ability, To each according to his needs. All run by an exhorbantly compensated "politoboro" of unelected adminstrators who have totalitarian authority to decide what are your abilities and what are your needs.

    Should you object to them standing between you and your doctor, interfering in medical decisions and their rationing of medical care, your only recourse is to "defect" to another.

    If we are so "Anti-Socialist", why don't we support a CAPITALIST medical system. One without insurance companies, where the individual pays for what they get and the prices are set by free market competition. You know the answer to that ....They actually love Socialism when it lines THEIR pockets and are terrified of real competition. If we had a CAPITALIST system, you would buy medical care like you do underwear, toothpaste, and video games. YOU would pay for what you get and vendors would have to compete with each other's prices to get business. Instead you join a collective, pay in according to your ability, and collect according to your needs... the Politboro deciding both. That is what we currently have and THAT is a textbook definition of Socialism. If you hate Socialism so badly, Stop being a Socialist, cancel your insurance and pay your own damn medical bills!

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.