Loaded Gun Falls Out Of Checked Bag. Feeling Secure At Airports Yet?

from the grope-grope-grope dept

It's always fun for me when Techdirt has stories about the TSA, but perhaps not for the same reasons as everyone else here. By that, I mean that the range of reaction to such stories always strikes me as incredibly varied. Get a story about the TSA working with the cosmopolitan state of Tennessee to check drivers for whatever it is they check for, and you'll get serious responses about our civil liberties being eroded. Write about these all-world defenders of truth and justice laying the smackdown on a possible-terrorist but confirmed breast cancer survivor and her mammory implants, and truly flabbergasted readers will demand action from our politicians. Relate the words of the guy that created the TSA to begin with and his apprehension about where the agency has gone in its off-broadway tour of security theatre, and you'll even get some folks defending the TSA in the comments. These are all well and good, true opinions and feelings from either side; the stirring of a wonderful national debate.

Me? I just like to laugh. And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA.

Gumnos alerts us (without a patdown, no less) to a USA Today story of how LAX's airport security is trying to define ironic comedy. At least, that's what I assume they're doing, because otherwise it means that some of their people may be in need of an IQ test. Look, no security is perfect. Something is going to sneak through occasionally. And we've been told the terrorists are creative, hiding exposives in their shoes (laces out, Dan), their underwear (I'm assuming they have to go with tighty-whities here, right? Or else everything would just kind of fall out?), and we've been told that the clearly deep-thinking and well-funded terrorist networks around the world are looking into hiding a multi-megaton nuclear warhead in a hair bonnet.

But what you don't expect to encounter is what happened at LAX. And that's for a loaded .38 caliber pistol to kind of just fall out of a passenger's duffel bag as it was being loaded onto the plane. Now, to be fair, the TSA promptly and proudly announced that it isn't their duty to screen anything but carryon luggage, as if this was some kind of a win for them. But all that makes me wonder is why a federal agency in charge of ensuring safe transportation is more concerned with slapping around our meaty bits than, oh I don't know, checking the damned luggage that goes on the plane! Again, this is not carryon luggage, but rather checked luggage. But how does it make any sense to parse out different sets of luggage to be checked by different agencies with potentially different equipment and...You know what? I'm not going to try to make sense of this for fear of a complete mental breakdown.

Still, I'm all about the positivity, which is why I pictured myself standing in line, waiting to board the plane (why am I always in Group D, damn it?) and watching the baggage handlers out the window lovingly slam my stuff into the luggage compartment, when a loaded .38 pistol comes spinning out of the bag and lands on the tarmac. After a moment of watching the handlers stare dumbly at each other for a moment, I burst out laughing, pointing at the gun, then back at the airline employees, then off in the distance where some TSA agent is playing puppet with a 98 year old triple amputee (try figuring that one out), then back at the gun. Rinse, repeat. Rinse, repeat.

So take a moment to thank the TSA for all the laughs.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 6:25am

    To quote Hitchhikers's Guide:

    So long and thanks for all the fish
    So sad that it has come to this!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Rick Falkvinge, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:23am

    This is halfway as it should be

    Actually, this is the way you SHOULD transport a firearm: in the checked luggage, as opposed to in the carryon. It is not illegal to travel with weapons you are licensed for.

    Now, to fulfill some more safety rules, of course the gun shouldn't have been loaded, and probably taken halfway apart. But the gun should absolutely go into the checked luggage.

    Also, who packs their luggage so bad that things start falling out in handling?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:27am

      Re: This is halfway as it should be

      I was just about to comment the same way. I don't like the TSA, but this article is just muck-stirring or fearmongering. The security alternative would have been a loaded weapon in the cabin. This fault lies entirely with the owner of the weapon.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        xenomancer (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:30am

        Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

        You missed the part where the TSA takes no responsibility for the contents of your luggage yet still feels the need to break in to see what's inside.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Oct 28th, 2011 @ 12:02am

          Re: Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

          I worked at TSA. My job was going through checked luggage.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Oct 28th, 2011 @ 10:10am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

            and put your fingers where they don't belong. You probably just 'did your job' because you otherwise could not feel confident about yourself. In any case, they should drag the lot of you to prison and keep them there for a loong looong time. Your kind is a disease and if anything, please do us a favor and score yourself a Darwin award.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        AJ (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:34am

        Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

        "This fault lies entirely with the owner of the weapon."

        I disagree, I think they share guilt. Yes the weapon should have been unloaded, but shouldn't the airline be responsible for verifying that the weapon was unloaded before loading it on a passenger airplane?

        If the airline is not verifying if a weapon is loaded/unloaded before putting it on an airplane, they have no business fondling my banana hammock before putting me on an airplane....

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Butcherer79 (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:06am

        Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

        Aren't bags scanned before they get loaded? Surely legally carried guns should have to be declared?
        If this got through, what's to say something a little more explosive can't go the same route?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        papapump (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:57am

        Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

        Exactly what I was thinking. I actually felt the moment of fear that the baggage handlers must have felt, watching that revolver fall to the ground. Some compact revolvers these days are hammerless, and most have some sort of safeguard against accidental discharge, but the idea of a .38 falling on its hammer and firing scares the crap out of me. The gun owner is an idiot.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:32am

      Re: This is halfway as it should be

      Agreed, I don't even think it needs to be dismantled in anyway, however, it should definately have been unloaded.

      An unloaded gun in checked baggage is less dangerous than a Snuggie wrapped around grandma in coach.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 10:22am

        Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

        the fact they didn't know a gun was in there bothers me though. what if it were something a lot more volatile and less friendly. this just shows everybody the weak point of the entire process.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Wonderboy14, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:16am

      Re: This is halfway as it should be

      Actually you're only half right. Admittedly I do live in a semi nanny-free state so actually, yes, you should transport your firearms locked in checked luggage but you can take your licensing requirement and shove it. Background check that's fine, but it's no one's business how many or what weapons I own.

      That reminds me... I've been meaning to pick up a new pistol. Shouldn't take more than an hour. I could take a long lunch and even break it in at the range before I come home... that minty fresh taste of freedom makes me smile.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        John Doe, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:22am

        Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

        that minty fresh taste of freedom makes me smile.

        Enjoy the taste while it lasts because it is going away fast. It is a sad time we live in when people are giving up their rights without so much as a squeak. I am sure the founding fathers were worried about our rights being taken away but I wonder if the thought ever crossed their mind that we would be gladly giving them up one day?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:24am

        Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

        Licensing requirements for firearms are a travesty of the constitution. Background checks are ok.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          papapump (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 9:06am

          Re: Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

          Californian living in Oregon here. Waiting periods, registration and background checks just seem natural to me, because I grew up with those stipulations. Now that I live in Oregon, I know some truely enthusiastic gun owners that would fight tooth and nail to prevent those things in this state.

          Oregon doesn't have the crime issue that California supposedly does (I'm from rural North California, so I didn't really see that, it's a different California than the one the rest of the country hears about), so I understand the more lax (HAHA!) views on the matter. But, being somewhat of a libertarian, this matter could be resolved without any actual legislation. The courts have proven willing to hold manufacturers potentially liable for their products. If gun sellers had a similar responsibility to the public, as they should, they would jump through the hoops willingly to make sure thier customers were legit.

          Wow...off topic.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Dementia (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 12:05pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: This is halfway as it should be

            Gun manufacturers are not, and should not be, liable for the actions of someone else. If the weapon functions as designed and no malfunction cause a death or injury, it is the operator of the weapons responsibility. Unless of course you want to hold auto manufacturers liable when someone is killed by a vehicle functioning they it was designed, but operated by someone with some sort of impairment.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Rob, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:35am

      Re: This is halfway as it should be

      Stuff also falls out of your luggage after the officials and unofficials rifling through your bag forget -- or don't bother -- to rezip, resnap and reclose everything.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Bengie, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:50am

      Re: This is halfway as it should be

      "Actually, this is the way you SHOULD transport a firearm"

      Loaded?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 10:22am

      Re: This is halfway as it should be

      Probably the same kind of person that packs a fully assembled and loaded gun?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    xenomancer (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:27am

    You Know, I Do Feel Safer Now

    I am comforted by the knowledge that should the movie Air Force One occur in real life (let's be honest, the TSA would be more concerned with testicles and breasts than AK-47's), Harrison Ford would be able to find a reasonable supply of armaments in the luggage area when he gets back on the plane half way through.

    Also, this happens to be the one loaded weapon (out of how many?) to accidentally fall out of luggage. I'm not saying they're letting through 90 wt% loaded armaments, but if the TSA isn't involved than you don't even get a show.

    Lastly, if it "isn't the duty" of the TSA to screen checked bags, why do they insist on letting us all know they were rutting around in them with a little plastic tag where our crippled locks used to be? I can take that as a sort of dark punchline to an otherwise dark joke, but this is one of those moments where I have to question the directors motives in changing up the theatrics.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:31am

      Re: You Know, I Do Feel Safer Now

      Just because it's not their duty to secure checked baggage doesn't mean they don't feel entitled to steal valuables from them.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chris Rhodes (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:29am

    Firearm Transportation

    Security rules require firearms to be in a locked case. You even have to declare them at the ticket counter so they can give you a little piece of paper to put with it so the baggage screeners know what's going on.

    Loaded and bouncing around in a duffel bag? Fail by all parties.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      :Lobo Santo (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:46am

      Re: Firearm Transportation

      Isn't it also illegal now to lock your luggage?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Lord Binky, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:15am

        Re: Re: Firearm Transportation

        They do not make conflicting rules, please read them again until the paradox is subsides.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          :Lobo Santo (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:32am

          Re: Re: Re: Firearm Transportation

          I don't fly (can't stand security theatre) and therefore shan't bother reading aforementioned rules--it just seems like the sort of thing such government agency(ies) would do.

          Agency A: Guns must be locked, unloaded, in checked luggage!

          Agency B: Locked ANYTHING in your luggage means you're a terrorist!

          Ya know, that sort of thing.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Chris Rhodes (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 3:58pm

        Re: Re: Firearm Transportation

        Not if you have a firearm in it. Hence the paper they give you to inform security.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Beta (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:29am

    haplophobia

    That gun certainly should not have been packed loaded, and not packed so carelessly that it could just fall out like that; there was a small but non-zero chance that it could have gone off when it hit the tarmac or some other hard surface (depending on the state of the safety catch and a few other things) and injured somebody.

    I see nothing wrong with a checked bag containing an unloaded gun. What's it gonna do, bluff the other suitcases into handing over their jewels?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:32am

    "And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA."

    Inappropriate response to jack-booted thugs. I think you've just encapsulated the present American decline: people are unable to deal with reality, just burst into laughs when "some TSA agent is playing puppet with a 98 year old triple amputee". -- The only adult response is rage, even if no action is taken.

    This "dark humor" piece falls flat, as usual. It's difficult NOT to suspect that /you're/ giving your actual reaction.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:39am

      Re: "And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA."

      I'm outraged at the fact that the TSA gets to search us in ways that they do not get to search Congress members. The nobility gets different treatment.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      out_of_the_blue, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:39am

      Re: "And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA."

      I am sorry for my previous comment, I am off my meds and can't stay away from forums when that happens. Please ignore anything I say on here from now on.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:29am

        Re: Re: "And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA."

        Your snowflake was so close that I had to check twice to see if he was apologizing.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Another AC, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:11am

      Re: "And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA."

      This comment falls flat, as usual - lots of words, no coherent point...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 10:25am

        Re: Re: "And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA."

        That's not true. His perfectly coherent point was that it's wrong to laugh at something.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 28th, 2011 @ 8:52am

      Re: "And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slash_(punctuation)#In_English_text

      Making up a new use for slashes does not make you seem less stupid then using caps all the time. Do the books your read highlight the important words in sentence? Are they reading primers for 4th graders? Write your sentences well and have a clear point and the reader will understand the important words. Rambling morons are the only people who need to add emphasis to individual words.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:37am

    Tim, nice bit of writing, but your anger is somewhat misplaced.

    The "loaded" part is the fault of the gun owner. Transporting a weapon should be done in a secure manner, and any failure to do so goes back to the gun owner.

    It is also clear that the gun was in checked baggage, and not a carry on. While I know you (and many others) want to stick it to the TSA every chance you get, please understand that a gun in checked baggage is less dangerous than even the smallest of weapons in the hands of a flier on the plane.

    I get your outrage, but I think it is very misdirected here. Call out the stupid flier for not clearing his gun and not properly securing it in his checked luggage, don't call out the TSA for somehow not being clairvoyant.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      AJ (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:52am

      Re:

      "Call out the stupid flier for not clearing his gun and not properly securing it in his checked luggage, don't call out the TSA for somehow not being clairvoyant."

      The flier is indeed an idiot and should be held accountable, but they weapons should have never made it onto the luggage cart loaded as it was.

      I think just taking the weapon owners word that a firearm is unloaded without a visual verification from a qualified TSA or airline representative is a HUGE failure in security.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:12am

        Re: Re:

        "The flier is indeed an idiot and should be held accountable, but they weapons should have never made it onto the luggage cart loaded as it was."

        Okay, outside of clairvoyance or magic, exactly how is the TSA suppose to know if a gun is loaded or not, especially when it is being transported legally in checked luggage? I don't think people even have to declare the fire arm if it is in checked luggage, do they? If they do, wouldn't it be the responsibility of the counter agent checking the bags in to assure this before the flyer is separated from their luggage?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          AJ (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:46am

          Re: Re: Re:

          "kay, outside of clairvoyance or magic, exactly how is the TSA suppose to know if a gun is loaded or not, especially when it is being transported legally in checked luggage?"

          By inspecting it at check in and tagging it unloaded, just like they are supposed to do?

          "If they do, wouldn't it be the responsibility of the counter agent checking the bags in to assure this before the flyer is separated from their luggage?"

          Yes, they have to declare it, and yes the guy checking in the bag should be making sure it's unloaded, or if they can't, finding an agent that can. That's why i said "visual verification from a qualified TSA or airline representative"

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:48am

          Re: Re: Re:

          How would they know if I put a bomb with a remote detonation device on my checked luggage? Are you saying that it would still be awfully easy for someone to sneak explosives on a plane and blow it up, even with all of the TSA's security?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Oct 28th, 2011 @ 9:20am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Well obviously they would have found your bomb. Except of course if it is shaped like a loaded handgun and not in the proper shipping container for a handgun.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:13am

      Re:

      "Tim, nice bit of writing, but your anger is somewhat misplaced."

      Well, thanks for the compliment. Now let's see if I can explain my "anger".

      "The "loaded" part is the fault of the gun owner. Transporting a weapon should be done in a secure manner, and any failure to do so goes back to the gun owner."

      Let's take that train of thought to its logical, if absurd, conclusion. The 3000 deaths on 9/11 were the fault of Al Quaeda, not the federal govt. that failed to protect us, so we should only blame Islamic extremists, not the CIA/FBI/etc. But that doesn't make sense. The whole point of the TSA is to protect flights, and a loaded weapon loose in luggage is a security issue they failed to address, possibly because they were too busy counting the number of curlies on my coin-purse.

      "It is also clear that the gun was in checked baggage, and not a carry on. While I know you (and many others) want to stick it to the TSA every chance you get, please understand that a gun in checked baggage is less dangerous than even the smallest of weapons in the hands of a flier on the plane."

      Here is where it's important to realize that not every plane that flies out of major airports like LAX are jumbo 747's that most folks are used to. There are several plane models still in commission which have floor access to baggage compartments. This is particularly true of flights that allow pet transportation, in which luggage compartments are not fully pressurized for fear of Fido turning into a big pile of dead. In other words, there are cases where a passenger overpowering the stewardess crew chief could access luggage. Not likely, but then neither was a series of planes flying into the WTC and all that.

      "I get your outrage, but I think it is very misdirected here. Call out the stupid flier for not clearing his gun and not properly securing it in his checked luggage, don't call out the TSA for somehow not being clairvoyant."

      We can disagree, and I respect that, but this isn't a matter of clairvoyance. It's simply a matter of the TSA wearing the security mantle so that they can slap my nuts around and then falling back on the "WE DON'T CHECK CHECKED BAGGAGE" excuse when this bullshit happens.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Rekrul, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 11:46am

        Re: Re:

        Here is where it's important to realize that not every plane that flies out of major airports like LAX are jumbo 747's that most folks are used to. There are several plane models still in commission which have floor access to baggage compartments.

        Call me uninformed, but I thought that all modern planes had access to the baggage compartment in case of emergencies.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    WDS (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 7:41am

    TSA is responsible

    TSA does screen, and is responsible for checked bags as well as carry on. The screenings for checked bags emphasize explosives rather than hand weapons.

    The gun falling out does not meet the shipping requirements for transporting a weapon, but it is perfectly legal to have an unloaded weapon in the baggage compartment.

    The TSA messes up so much. I think we should focus on the things that matter. If we scream about the petty things it makes the screams about the true injustices more easily ignored.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:10am

    This kind of post makes td truly worthless. Thanks for wasting my time Tim.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:15am

      Re:

      "This kind of post makes td truly worthless. Thanks for wasting my time Tim."

      You're welcome. It's part of my secret plot to take over the world through your particular dispeasure. Glad it's working....

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Another AC, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:18am

      Re:

      Tim didn't read this to you. Don't spend your time by your own choosing then turn around and blame others when you didn't like how you chose to spend it...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 1:14pm

        Re: Re:

        You might be right. In the future, I'll look at the name of the author. If the the name of the author starts with Tim then I will just move on. I don't care for the writing style of either of the Tim's that do free work for td.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:11am

    As someone who has checked in weapons many times; unloaded firearm verification is done by the checkin counter, NOT the TSA. They have you show them the firearm, they put in a little piece of paper that says it's unloaded, then you lock it up in a hard case and put that case into your luggage. When your luggage is scanned, there's zero chance that an xray will be able to determine if that little piece of paper is indeed in there or not as xrays can't read paper. Also, there's probably a very low chance that the xray will be able to see into the gun's chamber/cylinder/magazine to determine if it's loaded or not because guns are metal (who would have guessed?!).

    Also I'm wondering what kind of firearm it was and if there was a round in the chamber if semi-automatic. If there wasn't a round in the chamber, there's essentially a 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% chance of a round firing when the gun is dropped to the ground because it would require racking the slide first, and that's nearly impossible to do without human intending to do it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Lord Binky, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:27am

      Re:

      So... We use the honor system for check-in luggage that when scanned, contains weapons that fails to meet the minimum safety requirement of being in it's own locked hard case?

      Sounds like the TSA is trying to play security by only watching the main entrance while the back door is unlocked and wide open. Have they considered it only takes someone throwing a make-up kit with a tag onto a checked luggage cart to get what they want on any plane? Hell, they just have to work at the pizza hut inside the airport for a few months to grow familiarity with their face, and they can "get lost" anywhere they want. Whatever, it's only like gravity, it only exists if you believe it.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 8:44am

      Re:

      Please stop making logical arguments, this is clearly a thread about how evil the TSA is and how guns are destroying America!

      Go back to Texas you Republitard!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 9:01am

    I almost always travel with my gun. That being said, I always bring a copy of the procedures document. I generally find myself walking the TSA agents through the process of checking and clearing my weapon as well as reminding them what the requirements of checking a weapon are.

    I can say with a decent amount of certainty that there is not a lot of training on handling firearms in checked baggage.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    People kill people, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 9:39am

    What moron packs a loaded gun into their dufflebag?! Or any bag for that matter! A huge fail for the owner!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Overcast (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 9:45am

    They wouldn't have missed it if it was in a D sized bra cup I'm sure.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Overcast (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 9:48am

    Enjoy the taste while it lasts because it is going away fast. It is a sad time we live in when people are giving up their rights without so much as a squeak. I am sure the founding fathers were worried about our rights being taken away but I wonder if the thought ever crossed their mind that we would be gladly giving them up one day?

    And you can prod a sleeping bear - without it even moving for a while.. but eventually, it'll wake up - and when it does.. it'll be pissed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    The Incoherent One (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 11:15am

    I own a firearm, and have only ONCE had anyone give me grief about it. That person that gave me grief was quickly silenced by his supervisor when I produced my UTAH carry license. Checked luggage is something that they do not think you will have access to. I transported my firearm with over 500 rounds on a southwest flight last month.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Montezuma (profile), Oct 27th, 2011 @ 11:25am

    Firearms are allowed on planes, albeit not in this way.

    You guys do understand that civilians can bring firearms onto planes, but there are restrictions to this. It isn't as if civilians can bring loaded firearms into the passenger compartments of the plan. Though, I believe civilians should be able to do that, such a discussion is for another place.

    In order to bring a firearm onto a plane, the firearm must be:

    1. Unloaded, which included, most annoyingly, removing all ammunition from the firearm's magazine(s).

    2. The firearm(s), ammunition, and magazine(s) must all be locked in a secured container. This container must be loaded into the passenger's checked luggage. The passenger has to, stupidly, open the container, allow for inspection, the lock the container.

    The passenger, not the airline, nor some governmental agent, must maintain the key, or other entry device. Also, the luggage cannot be marked to notate that a firearm is held within, for obvious reasons. I have found the cases I carry my rifles and/or handguns in pried at, but never fully opened, thanks to the wonderful engineering of the manufacturer of my firearm cases.

    3. The firearm must be declared at the checked luggage counter. If this step is missed or avoided, this can cause problems for the passenger.

    4. No more than fifty(50) round of ammunition can be carried onto the plane. This is really irritating, as this means that I have to pay a lot of money for 500 to 2,000 round of ammunition wherever I ended up traveling to. This gets expensive, as there is not always a police supply, or other discount ammunition outlet where I am traveling to.

    Other rules will depend on the airline you are traveling with. I have run into many stupid people that give me a "what do we do with this?" look when I go to check my firearm(s). I even run into, on rare occasions, where these idiots will want to removed my firearm(s), in view of everyone, to "check" the firearm(s), which they are unable to successfully maneuver.

    If my traveling were not so important, I wouldn't do it. The only problem is that those classes will not teach themselves.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 27th, 2011 @ 5:41pm

    What's wrong with a gun in luggage? It seems like a reasonable way to transport guns to me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 28th, 2011 @ 9:07am

      Re:

      The problem is if they let undeclared loaded guns onto planes are they also letting other dangerous things onto planes. Not to mention, why are my nuts getting fondled to keep me from carrying a weapon on a plane if I can just access the baggage department mid-flight?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Paul, Oct 28th, 2011 @ 8:28pm

    This might have been mentioned, but wasn't there a story a while back about a guy smuggling guns to the UK in checked baggage?

    Last time I went thru LAX they were piss poor all round, with more people standing around with vacant looks in there eyes and one poor bastard checking everyone's passport with people queuing back for 90 minutes.

    That'll serve me right for flying on a tuesday morning when its quiet.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This