by Mike Masnick
Fri, Oct 21st 2011 9:07am
As we've discussed in reference to PROTECT IP, those who are in favor of censorship always have some sort of convoluted rationale for why it's not really censorship. They'll always argue that it's something different. In the case of PROTECT IP, obviously, they claim it's to stop infringement -- ignoring that it's still censorship. So it's little surprise to see the Chinese sounding just like PROTECT IP supporters in defending the Great Firewall of China by claiming that it's not about censorship at all. A government spokeswoman defending China from a US diplomat's complaint about the Great Firewall insists that it supports freedom of speech... but it has to filter and block websites online to "safeguard the public." And it claims it does so "in line with internationally accepted practices." Indeed, and PROTECT IP is just about "safeguarding some companies." There's always an excuse, but it never changes the simple fact that censorship is censorship.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- German Justice Minister Fires Top Prosecutor Over 'Treason' Probe Into Journalists After War Of Words
- If Google Shouldn't Apply EU's 'Right To Be Forgotten' Everywhere, Why Should It Apply US DMCA Takedowns Globally?
- Spanish Cops Use New Law To Fine Facebook Commenter For Calling Them 'Slackers'
- Ridiculous 'Terrorist Reporting' Provision In Intelligence Authorization Would Undermine The First Amendment
- Judge Bars Anti-Abortion Group From Releasing Video... Raising Serious First Amendment Questions