by Mike Masnick
Fri, Oct 21st 2011 9:07am
As we've discussed in reference to PROTECT IP, those who are in favor of censorship always have some sort of convoluted rationale for why it's not really censorship. They'll always argue that it's something different. In the case of PROTECT IP, obviously, they claim it's to stop infringement -- ignoring that it's still censorship. So it's little surprise to see the Chinese sounding just like PROTECT IP supporters in defending the Great Firewall of China by claiming that it's not about censorship at all. A government spokeswoman defending China from a US diplomat's complaint about the Great Firewall insists that it supports freedom of speech... but it has to filter and block websites online to "safeguard the public." And it claims it does so "in line with internationally accepted practices." Indeed, and PROTECT IP is just about "safeguarding some companies." There's always an excuse, but it never changes the simple fact that censorship is censorship.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- NY Judge Says Prior Restraint Is America's Best Defense Against Internet 'Chaos'
- The US Charging Assange For Publishing Documents Would Be An Unprecedented Attempt To Chill A Free Press
- Hypocritical CIA Director Goes On Rant About Wikileaks, Free Speech
- China's Precision Censorship Machine Allows Some Controversial Keywords, But Blocks Combinations Of Them
- Secret Sorority Handshakes, Questionable Lawsuits, Free Speech, The Right To Be Forgotten And Section 230