by Mike Masnick
Wed, Sep 28th 2011 10:59pm
Given the widespread public backlash over OnStar's plan to keep tracking people after they'd canceled their service -- and to potentially sell aggregate info to advertisers -- it appears that OnStar did what many people expected and backed away from the plan. It may have helped that a bunch of Senators had raised some questions about the legality of the move in the first place. The new plan will leave tracking as an option, but only on an opt-in basis, rather than an opt-out basis. As OnStar's President explained it, "We realize that our proposed amendments did not satisfy our subscribers." That's PR-speak for "we totally screwed up."
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- UK Tribunal Rules GCHQ Conducted Illegal Surveillance And Must Destroy Legally Privileged Documents
- Government Agencies Love Expanding E-ZPass Coverage; Handling Data Responsibly, Not So Much
- New Version Of USA Freedom Surveillance Reform Bill To Hit The House This Week
- GM Says That While You May Own Your Car, It Owns The Software In It, Thanks To Copyright
- Ford Hits Back On Ridiculous Lawsuit Demanding $2,500 Per CD Ripper In Its Cars