by Mike Masnick
Wed, Sep 28th 2011 10:59pm
Given the widespread public backlash over OnStar's plan to keep tracking people after they'd canceled their service -- and to potentially sell aggregate info to advertisers -- it appears that OnStar did what many people expected and backed away from the plan. It may have helped that a bunch of Senators had raised some questions about the legality of the move in the first place. The new plan will leave tracking as an option, but only on an opt-in basis, rather than an opt-out basis. As OnStar's President explained it, "We realize that our proposed amendments did not satisfy our subscribers." That's PR-speak for "we totally screwed up."
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Did You Hear About How ISIS Has A Sophisticated Training Manual For Encryption? Yeah, It Was Actually A Pamphlet For Journalists And Activists
- Telegraph Publishes The Dumbest Article On Encryption You'll Ever Read... Written By David Cameron's Former Speechwriter
- Is There Any Evidence In The World That Would Convince Intelligence Community That More Surveillance Isn't The Answer?
- It Only Took GM Five Years To Patch Dangerous Vulnerability Impacting Millions Of Automobiles
- EPA Sides With GM In Telling Copyright Office That Copyright Should Stop You From Modifying Your Car Software