Even If You Cancel Your OnStar Service, The Company Will Still Track (And Sell) Your Location

from the how-nice-of-them dept

GM subsidiary OnStar is apparently alerting its customers that even if they decide to cancel their service in the future, OnStar will still track information about them -- and, of course, potentially sell that data.
“What’s changed [is that if] you want to cancel your OnStar service, we are going to maintain a two-way connection to your vehicle unless the customer says otherwise.”
OnStar is spinning this as a plan to make it "easier to re-enroll" as a customer, but it also seems to admit that there's demand out there for the data that OnStar collects, so it has plenty of incentive to get more such data, even from non-customers. Of course, they don't even seem to acknowledge the creepiness factor of canceling a service, and then still having that service track your every move.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    John Doe, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 10:48am

    Welcome to 1984

    With all the data being gathered by various parties on our location, spending habits, etc makes the book 1984 looks absolutely mild. Credit cards know where and what you spend your money on, smartphones and apparently your Chevy know your location, cell phone companies have your text and call history and Google and others have tons more info such as surf history, search history, shopping, voice and so on. Not to mention all the info Facebook, Twitter and lots of smartphone apps track.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 10:52am

    Re: Welcome to 1984

    Hide from technology. Only use cash, only turn on your cell phone when you need to use it. Encrypt all your internet traffic and route it through TOR. The alternative is to take the privacy invasion that comes with convenience. OFC the credit card company knows where you use your credit card. They pay the vendor. You can take steps to anonymize yourself, but they're a hassle so most people don't bother. Let's try not to be too alarmist here.

    That said, the Onstar policy of tracking ex-customers is fucked beyond creepy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    jilocasin, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 10:57am

    One more reason to go strictly 'OPT-IN"

    This is just one more reason (as if we really needed one) to have a law only allowing companies to collect data on a strictly OPT-IN basis.

    As in, unless the customer explicitly "OPTS-IN" to have On-Star track their movements, then they can't legally do it.

    That would kill this particular example of over reaching creepiness dead on arrival.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chosen Reject (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:36pm

      Re: One more reason to go strictly 'OPT-IN"

      Too true. You know who else surreptitiously keeps track of all your movements until you opt-out? Stalkers. Cancel your onstar service, and get a free onstalker service.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Spaceman Spiff (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:00am

    How long before...

    Just how long will it be before Big Brother starts using this data to track us each in real time? Privacy? It is a defunct concept in this day and age. :-(

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      John Doe, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:02am

      Re: How long before...

      I would imagine that the DHS already is, at least for "terrorist suspects", which is probably anybody they decide they want to track.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      pixelpusher220 (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:29am

      Re: How long before...

      Remember it's not a 4th amendment violation for them to get your data from GM. So you have absolutely no recourse on this.

      It's basically the same as the PROTECT IP act I think. Gov't forces ISPs to save data, then Gov't can easily obtain the data without having to get a warrant.

      The GM factor is just that they are collecting the data already stored inside your vehicle in a central location.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:02am

    One more reason to never buy a product from Government Motors.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:05am

    One more reason to never buy a product from Government Motors.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    David Cortright (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:06am

    They can't track if the device isn't operational

    If I owned a vehicle with OnStar, I'd get under the hood with some wire cutters or maybe a hammer and make sure that the device couldn't track me. Or is there something in the agreement where this equipment isn't really mine and is only leased to me for use with their service? I wouldn't put it past them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      jackn, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:24am

      Re: They can't track if the device isn't operational

      Yeah, sorry this would be a felony nowadays.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      harbingerofdoom (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:30pm

      Re: They can't track if the device isn't operational

      apparently the power for it runs through one specific fuse from what ive read about disabling them. i dont have a car with onstar so i cant say how correct that is...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Skeptical Cynic (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:43pm

      Re: They can't track if the device isn't operational

      According to other commenters you should just wear a tin-foil hat.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Trails (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:09am

    Stupid

    They could offer some low-cost service as "Free but we can sell your data" and people would flock to it. Instead giving them nothing and selling their data comes off as creepy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    David (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:13am

    Just Rip it out

    I would just rip the thing out of the dashboard... Put in a nice potted plant.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    anonymous, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:13am

    and Google is under the cosh for what it allegedly does? unbelievable!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Scooters (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:16am

    Nothing a pair of wire cutters can't fix.

    Next up, they'll tell customers they'll have two plans, one which tracks, and one which does not, to better benefit the customer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      New Mexico Mark, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:26pm

      Re:

      The "no tracking" plan will cost more, of course. And the data will *still* be collected -- guaranteed.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      hmm (profile), Sep 29th, 2011 @ 1:37pm

      Re:

      Yes they have two plans..the expensive one which just tracks your every move in your car and the slightly cheaper version which tells every OTHER car within range about "that dude over there that totally looks like he wouldn't fight back if he were raped/carjacked....."

      Again the choice is yours...decisions, decisions......

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:17am

    I actually thought about hacking my OnStar mic to work with bluetooth so that I can hook my phone up to it and use it in the car. Now I have a good excuse to figure out how to do it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:29pm

      Re:

      There are products explicitly for that already. I have started some research into them but have not purchased or tried one yet.

      Here's one example: bluestar (http://www.costartech.com/pb/products/bluestar.html) -- basically you remove your onstar module and plug in the bluetooth module in its place -- it then uses your onstar mic & buttons to control your phone as a bluetooth handsfree unit.

      There are other equivalent products out there -- the one I linked to is just the first I found when I was searching. I have no experience with it myself whatsoever, but it looks cool to me :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:59pm

      Re:

      http://hackaday.com/?s=onstar

      People have done work on that before and there is already a lot of data on how to do it, including spying on OnStar data transmission.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 2:01pm

      Re:

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    A non-mouse, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:19am

    Used cars?

    So what happens when an "ex-customer" sells their car? The new owner is now being tracked without their, having never been told that they would need to opt-out of this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Lesath (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:23am

    Not that I own a newer car with OnStar but if I had opted out of the service, I would certainly upset that they are still tracking me. Might even find the offending chip/sensor and rip it out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Jay (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:33am

    Do they have Sting as a customer?

    Maybe at odd times they can play The Police to you at no extra charge:

    Every breath you take
    And every move you make
    Every bond you break, every step you take
    I'll be watching you

    Every single day
    And every word you say
    Every game you play, every night you stay
    I'll be watching you

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    pegr, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:41am

    Heard a good line today

    Heard a good line today that fits this perfectly:

    If you don't pay, you're not the customer. You're the product.

    (Originally in reference to Facebook.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Akiva, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:42am

    Free to Police and Court Cases

    If data exists, it can be examined. If lawyers know it exists, it can be subpoenaed in court.

    So your spouse can see exactly where you've traveled in the divorce case. The police can see exactly where you traveled when investigating you for passing around copyrighted movies.

    This is indeed a rip-it-out level problem.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Adam Denison at OnStar, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:46am

    OnStar Clarification

    Just to clarify, when a customer calls to cancel we give them the choice to allow us to maintain that data connection. You mention the ease of re-enrollment in your post, but there are more benefits to the customer. For example, with that limited two-way connection available we could potentially let people know about severe weather alerts like tornado warnings or mandatory evacuations. Or we could send messages to the vehicle regarding warranty or recall matters. Our VP of Subscriber Services shot a video yesterday where she explains the Terms & Conditions in more detail: http://bit.ly/onstarTandC

    Adam Denison
    OnStar Communications

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      AJ, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:02pm

      Re: OnStar Clarification

      "You mention the ease of re-enrollment in your post, but there are more benefits to the customer."

      You mean there are "potentially" more benefits to the customer right?

      Either you are offering limited services in exchange for my geographic data, or your not. I could "potentially" win the lottery, but we both know the odds of that happening....

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      ComputerAddict (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:03pm

      Re: OnStar Clarification

      Since I already canceled two years ago are you going to call me and give me that option now? Because that option wasn't offered when I canceled at the time. Am I going to be tracked?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:03pm

      Re: OnStar Clarification

      It is nice to see OnStar actively helping customers understand the changes. Thanks for showing up hear to add insight.

      Or we could send messages to the vehicle regarding warranty or recall matters.

      I get enough "Your warranty is about to expire" mailings. It would just be even more annoying if my car started barking out warnings at me...especially when I bought the car used and the warranty wouldn't cover anything anyways. I like that you still add some value (albeit rare occasions, ie. mandatory evacuations?...tornado warnings?) to non-enrolled customers for tracking, storing, and selling their data. I still believe an opt-out should be an option for those who prefer privacy to little added benefit.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike C. (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:07pm

      Re: OnStar Clarification

      The problem is, from the sounds of things, when a customer cancels they must opt-OUT of further tracking. In this day and age when privacy is such a big issue to a lot of people, wouldn't the better move have been to set it up as an opt-IN program? Consider the complaints and tirades you're seeing now versus what people might say if this were the pitch instead:

      OnStar is now offering a free limited service for those customers who no longer want or can afford the premium service. With the free service, your account is maintained at OnStar for easy re-enrollment later. Additionally, we can still send you urgent alerts to issues in your area such as road closures, significant weather events (tornado warnings) and mandatory evacuations. This new service is 100% free but will require continued connection to the subscibed vehicle.

      Someone was asleep at the switch on this one.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:26pm

      Re: OnStar Clarification

      Yah, except for the warranty stuff -- which is covered by a telephone and mail, I already have an in-car device that offers me all of those benefits for free. It's called a radio.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 9:58pm

      Re: OnStar Clarification

      You have been blathering silliness like this all over the internet today but you just don't get it do you Adam?

      Done right Onstar was not a bad concept. However, clearly Onstar is no longer out to offer a service as customer centric organization. The temptation was just too great and like so many other businesses of today you could not resist the tendency to view customers as a simple resource to exploited.

      You want to collect and warehouse huge amounts of data about one's presence and activity in the physical world. Something that has no relevance to the reasons why someone would subscribe to the service in the first place. You should be paying us!

      I don't care if you never sell or share it. I don't care if you don't sell or share personally identifiable data (which is a joke in the first place with this sort of data). I don't care if your systems are so secure they will never be hacked. I DON'T CARE! There is no reason to collect and store this data in this manner in the first place! Your policy in regard to how you will treat the data is irrelevant. This is simply something I am not interested in being part of in any form.

      Your policy used to limit the use of the data to serve the customer. Such as locating a stolen car or for accident response. You claimed not to otherwise collect or store data. This was the right policy. Now you want to collect data to serve you. Very personal data that shouldn't be collected and stored in the first place. I will not tolerate the continuous collection of my movements and activities for your benefit. I hope anyone with an Onstar device in their vehicle will ensure the service is cancelled and the system is deactivated. Perhaps we should even consider avoiding GM vehicles completely.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Bryan Price (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 11:58am

    Just who's data is it, really?

    I consider that to be MY data. Just because they CAN track my location is not an excuse/reason that they now OWN MY data.

    I think laws do need to be written that explicitly state that a person's data is the property of that person. There may very well be consequences of getting something like that passed, but we WILL have to deal with it, sooner or later.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:11pm

    With OnStar's history

    OnStar is evil, there is no doubt about that. However, given that OnStar has, since the very beginning, had many cases of their systems being used to spy on people -- not just systems and location data, but also audio eavesdropping in the car cabin -- happen that were very well publicized, this sort of thing falls squarely under the "what did you expect?" category.

    Anyone who allows OnStar equipment in their vehicle without physically disabling it is just asking for trouble of some sort sooner or later. Personally, I have and will continue to avoid purchasing vehicles because OnStar existed in them. I don't care if it's "activated" or not. I have to take their word for it, and I cannot trust their word.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Skeptical Cynic (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:29pm

      Re: With OnStar's history

      I agree with your idea. In the end how do we know if your not being tracked everywhere and that the government isn't then behind everyone's back hacking those systems to get the data? They have done it in the past.

      I have nothing to hide but the thought of someone tracking me just makes me scream. Why, because history teaches that that will always be used to control us.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        David (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:51pm

        Waiter!

        Two tin-foil hats for these folks, please.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Skeptical Cynic (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:14pm

          Re: Waiter!

          I am not a conspiracy crazy, but the gestapo and the secret police did not happen over night. They started by monitoring people first. Check your history.

          Just a thought exercise. During your normal day how often do you think someone somewhere can NOT find out where you are? Think about it, really think about it.

          Do I think that we are on the verge of being a police state, no. But I think that we have allowed ourselves to be subjected to too much in terms of loss of privacy.

          Everyday you can read here and many other sites and see where we have failed to fight the erosion of our privacy. Failed to fight the erosion of our rights.

          I am not out there when I worry that I can be put in prison for 75 years because I videoed a police officer in public doing something, anything. When I worry that the government will be able to access information they should not be able to without a court order, but they can.

          I am not out there because this worries me. Government should only have exactly the powers we let it have. It should not be able to decide for itself what it can or can not do. It should only perform those duties that we have with full knowledge allowed it to do.

          The slippery slope is not only in the passing of laws but in the abdication of those freedoms that are on the surface still there but have long been superseded.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          John Fenderson (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 2:35pm

          Re: Waiter!

          No, tinfoil hats are for those who are wildly speculating. We know for fact how OnStar services have been used in the past, and it's hardly nutty to expect it to continue in the future. It's not like it's some kind of secret, or that OnStar denies any of it. In fact, I've long credited (and still credit) OnStar with being unusually forthcoming about this stuff.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Skeptical Cynic (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:24pm

    Big Brother is not always the GOV

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 12:49pm

    Opt-out, problem solved!

    If they continue to track you, SUE them

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Skeptical Cynic (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:29pm

      Re:

      But how would you know they are still tracking you? The information is aggregated and anonymized.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Rich Kulawiec, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:42pm

        Re: Re:

        If you had been paying attention over the past few years, you would be painfully well aware that "aggregated" and "anonymized" do not often mean what people wish them to mean, or what people hope they mean. (See, for example, AOL's infamous debacle.) Sufficiently clever people (of which there are many) with access to sufficiently diverse and rich data sources (of which there are many) can often quite effectively de-aggregate and de-anonymize data.

        In other words, the problem is much, MUCH harder to solve that it appears to be. And this is generously presuming that those claiming to be solving it are actually serious about doing so, not merely attempting to present the appearance.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Rich Kulawiec, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:05pm

    Here is how it will happen

    OnStar has just publicly announced that it is building a target...a very attractive target.

    Therefore they will be hacked. Please...do not waste my valuable time foolishly suggesting otherwise. It is inevitable. It is only a question of when, and who, and how.

    After they are hacked, some or all of their data will be copied. It will then be put on the open market for sale to anyone with sufficient cash-in-hand. This will include spammers, phishers, pedophiles, rapists, stalkers, extortionists, and others. It will also include purchasers who have already acquired other substantial databases of interest and intend to cross-correlate them -- and then either use or sell the resulting enriched data.

    All of this will steadily be denied by OnStar's corporate spokeliars. Eventually, it will become too painfully obvious to deny, and those same spokesliars will use the time-honored phrase of corporations everywhere who have done something really stupid in order to satiate the sociopathic greed of their executives:

    "No one could have forseen..."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Thomas (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:08pm

    Anybody want to bet...

    it won't be anonymous when they sell it to the federal spooks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:13pm

    Ok, if they want to keep on tracking me after I cancel their service then I demand that they start paying me for my services. After all, it takes money to buy gas to keep my car going all over the place. You think people who want to buy my location information would still want to buy it if I kept my car at home all day long? If OnStar are going to make money off of me then why shouldn't I get my fair share of it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Narg, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:18pm

    So what...

    So what would On-Star do with the data JUST FOR YOU?!?! Nothing, that's what. You guys need to get new tin-foil hats, your current one's are defective.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Skeptical Cynic (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:42pm

      Re: So what...

      That data is sold to traffic monitoring services. That data is sold with GPS data to those making maps and it is there to be viewed if a hacker wants it.

      Even if you have nothing that you do where you would care about being tracked, does it not still creep you out that they can?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:22pm

    I don't have this equipment in my vehicle (thank heavens). If I did, I would be on the internet to find out how to disable it. Once that was done, I would be finding out where the antenna wire comes in from that thing and would cut it too.

    Too many times there have been false controls, fuses, etc to give you the sense you did something while the real control lays elsewhere. The best example I can think of is the false thermostat on the wall the employees can go money with and keep complaints down to a minimum while the real control lays locked up and isolated from view.

    With the level of sneakiness that requires opt-out rather than opt-in, it is not beyond belief that sort of setup exists already within those vehicles. With the activation to sell this data, it shows that the product maker has no respect for the customer beyond being the cash cow. I in turn have no respect for product makers and service providers who do things in this manner.

    I long ago gave up on American vehicles. To put it simply, it isn't worth the money paid for it as they don't last. Pay a 1/3 more for a Japanese vehicle you get twice the life in use. It doesn't require multiple trips to the authorized service center to attempt to repair it. Like it or lump it, this is a good part of what happened to the automotive industry.

    Items like "we will now track everywhere you go collecting information" won't bring me back to buying but will more firmly convince me to never buy.

    Congratulations on alienating your potential customer base. You've already lost one here for life, care to go for a nation's worth?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Peter, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:29pm

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    mikey4001 (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:53pm

    rotten timing

    I am currently driving a 97 Chevy. Before that it was an 89 Oldsmobile, and before that another Chevy. By the end of next year I plan to be in a new car. It will not be anything (read: GM) with this crap attached to it. Congratulations for chasing away a life-long customer during the worst recession in two generations (and I am likely not alone). The amount of undiluted stupid oozing out of this marketing scheme is incredible.

    I mean, seriously, this is your plan to sell cars? Spy on your customers and sell the details of their private lives? I hope you get good money for the info you collect, because you're already in the hole for at least $25,000 or $30,000 because I am no longer planning to buy one of these.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Frost (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 1:55pm

    Obvious end result

    Tracking services will inevitably lead to abuses like this as long as it makes sense to abuse it. And it will make sense to abuse things this way as long as society clings to the profit motive and money - the abuse of tracking tech in this case can be easily converted to profit and be used by the government to track people.

    This is problematic because said government is wholly controlled by the wealthy segment of society and they have a vested interest in containing any dissenters, peace activists and others who threaten their profit margins and work for more equitable resource allocation.

    Of course, the same is true for crime and pollution and conspicuous consumption and any number of nasty behavior that all comes down to money in the end; as long as we cling to this failed societal design we will continue to be victimized by its functionality.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    OnStar, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 2:11pm

    Clarification

    Hi, I'm with the OnStar team. We're seeing similar concerns from other channels, and I wanted to let everyone know that we value our customers’ privacy and security and have never sold any personally identifiable information to any third party.

    To be clear and transparent regarding our business practices we have put together the video below.

    http://bit.ly/onstarTandC

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      mikey4001 (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 2:36pm

      Re: Clarification

      I wanted to let everyone know that we value our customers’ privacy and security and have never sold any personally identifiable information to any third party.

      Do you have a clearly stated and firm policy regarding the release of customers' information to "authority" figures?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      mikey4001 (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 2:38pm

      Re: Clarification

      Also: have never and will never are two entirely different sentiments.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 2:55pm

      Re: Clarification

      So you don't deny that you may in the future sell personally identifiable data, or that you may have in the past sold anonymized data (which is of course at risk of being de-anonymized).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), Sep 23rd, 2011 @ 10:22am

      Re: Clarification

      Do you consider location to be personally identifiable information? Because it is.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Jeffrey Nonken (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 2:46pm

    I'd rather push a Ford...

    I've always thought that anybody claiming "I'd rather push a Ford than drive a Chevy" was just being obnoxious, short-sighted and narrow-minded. I mean, really, they're just freakin' cars, fer cryin' out loud. If you don't like Chevrolet, fine, don't buy one and get out of my face.

    GM is doing a great job at changing my mind.

    That said, I'd like to see somebody try to bring them to court on stalking charges....

    P.S. "Friends don't let friends drive Hondas." ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 3:09pm

    Does it not strike anyone that the presence of someone claiming to be from OnStar here on this forum is a sign they realize they have stepped in deep doo-doo and are now trying desperately to do damage control with those who are changing their minds about just what buying a government motors vehicle will really mean to them during their lifetime?

    Time and again, I've seen this reaction and after all the smoke clears, it has been a campaign to try and sell some idea or new notion that has hit some business that is particularly sneaky or nauseous. The same notion seems to fail to go over with the public as being so great.

    If they are here at this forum, they are elsewhere at other forums, trying to turn the tide of public opinion before it gets locked down.

    I will never buy a government motors product after this little escapade. Even if they claim to change their mind 'due to public outcry' have they really? Or have they just went underground with the practice while continuing on? As often as not, that is the reality that happens when some group says they change their mind.

    This particular incident enforces the idea you can't trust them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Steve R. (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 3:57pm

    Lawyers Delight

    The Lawyers will have a field day.

    Some guy cheats on his wife and the wife calls OnStar.

    Some social reprehensible person commits heinous crimes that could have been prevented if OnStar disclosed the locational information. The newspapers will have a field day.

    Someone installs a Ford product in a GM car. It immediately ceases to operate for some unknown reason.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    c0c0c0 (profile), Sep 22nd, 2011 @ 3:59pm

    "anonymized" data

    When you are using a service that has GPS or cell tower tracking, how can this data be anonymized without stipping out the waypoints? Give me two weeks of anonymized data and I can tell you where that person or group of people works and lives. It isn't that hard to make those conclusions.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Witness Protection, Sep 23rd, 2011 @ 6:00pm

    So where is the difference?

    If you own and use a cell phone, credit card, or DVR - you're already getting tracked and monitored, and your information is already being sold. If you have a facebook account or use a search engine your information is being tracked, monitored, and sold. How is having an onstar unit any different? You can at least opt-out and you are at least being told about how your data will/could be used.

    Many companies will bury this info in their policies and make a point of bringing up they sell your info. As it has been more and more in the digital age, you can have convenience or you can have privacy, but you will always sell one for the other.

    As an employee of onstar who happens to read techdirt often, I can tell you there is never an ALWAYS on connection with any vehicle, a call must always be placed from Onstar or by the Person in the vehicle. There are also things like a ring tone, that you hear in the vehicle or or phone icon you can see if we make any kind of voice call to the vehicle, you'll know. Currently any information shared is with partners to provide services to the customer. Can't make a call? we need to give the cell provider your cellular information, and maybe even location so they can check for an outage or other cellular issue. Need to know information about your vehicle, we might need to share your VIN with GM's customer assistance center. Want to make an appointment at your local dealer to change your oil... we need to share info with the dealer. The list goes on.

    Really the only difference between onstar and many other companies, is that they actually are putting the news out to let you know what our policies are and make your own choice to opt-out or not.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dunlin, Sep 26th, 2011 @ 5:57am

    Onstar tracking

    Onstar has probably just put themselves out of business !!! I was going to rejoin, but now I am just opting out !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 7:57pm

    Whats so bad about companies knowing our driving habits or stores we go to or where we are going? You guys are PARAMOID to the fullest!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This