by Mike Masnick
Wed, Aug 31st 2011 11:54am
If you follow the political world these days, you'd think that there was nothing out there that a "bleeding-heart liberal" and a "Tea Party conservative" might agree on. But it appears that the hugely problematic PROTECT IP Act is bringing together such diverse interests. David Segal and Patrick Ruffini -- who probably don't agree on very much at all politically -- teamed up to write an editorial about the problems of PROTECT IP, for OregonLive. The editorial notes the massive unintended consequences likely to come from the bill, and highlights how this is an issue outside of any standard political spectrum. This isn't an issue about political viewpoints. It's an issue about fundamental values and the belief that censorship is wrong.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Following Canada's Bad Example, Now UK Wants To Muzzle Scientists And Their Inconvenient Truths
- China's Great Firewall Turned Around: Why China Wants To Censor Global Internet
- Free Speech, Censorship, Moderation And Community: The Copia Discussion
- Indian Supreme Court Strikes Down Censorship Law -- But Leaves Web Blocking
- French Government Starts Blocking Websites With Views The Gov't Doesn't Like