by Mike Masnick
Wed, Aug 31st 2011 11:54am
If you follow the political world these days, you'd think that there was nothing out there that a "bleeding-heart liberal" and a "Tea Party conservative" might agree on. But it appears that the hugely problematic PROTECT IP Act is bringing together such diverse interests. David Segal and Patrick Ruffini -- who probably don't agree on very much at all politically -- teamed up to write an editorial about the problems of PROTECT IP, for OregonLive. The editorial notes the massive unintended consequences likely to come from the bill, and highlights how this is an issue outside of any standard political spectrum. This isn't an issue about political viewpoints. It's an issue about fundamental values and the belief that censorship is wrong.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Another Unfortunate Example Of Facebook Silencing Important Videos
- Security Researchers Sued For Exposing Internet Filtering Company's Sale Of Censorship Software To Blacklisted Country
- Russian Copyright Law Allows Entire News Site To Be Shut Down Over A Single Copied Article
- Russian Censor Bans Comodo... Doesn't Realize Its Own Security Certificate Is From Comodo
- MPAA Front Group, Pretending To Represent Consumer Interests, Slams CloudFlare For Not Censoring The Internet