by Mike Masnick
Wed, Aug 31st 2011 11:54am
If you follow the political world these days, you'd think that there was nothing out there that a "bleeding-heart liberal" and a "Tea Party conservative" might agree on. But it appears that the hugely problematic PROTECT IP Act is bringing together such diverse interests. David Segal and Patrick Ruffini -- who probably don't agree on very much at all politically -- teamed up to write an editorial about the problems of PROTECT IP, for OregonLive. The editorial notes the massive unintended consequences likely to come from the bill, and highlights how this is an issue outside of any standard political spectrum. This isn't an issue about political viewpoints. It's an issue about fundamental values and the belief that censorship is wrong.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- UK Home Secretary: I Need People Who Understand The Necessary Hashtags To Censor Bad People Online
- China Clamps Down On Another Serious Threat To The Middle Kingdom: Western Animal Cartoon Books For Children
- Georgia Lawmakers Look To Go Down Porn-Censoring Unconstitutional Rabbit Hole
- UK Court Grants First Live Blocking Order To Stop New Infringing Streams As Soon As They Start
- 'Fake News' Now Means Whatever People Want It To Mean, And Legislating It Away Is A Slippery Slope Toward Censorship