Free Speech

by Mike Masnick

Filed Under:
california, juries, twitter

California Wants To Put Jurors In Jail For Tweeting About Trial

from the overkill dept

We've seen a few stories over the years about jurors tweeting or otherwise discussing trials via social media. Obviously, the courts don't like that, as they usually have bans on discussing cases publicly while they're ongoing. However, in a culture of sharing all sorts of things going on in one's life, it's difficult for some people to shut off. And, to be clear, I'm not entirely sure why it's so bad to talk about a case, in general. I can understand specific instances, based on what you're talking about, but an overall ban just seems unreasonable and unworkable. However, as the courts and governments deal with this issue, we're going to see more overreactions like the following.

California has now passed a law that will allow it to put people in jail for tweeting about a case as a juror. As that link explains, courts already have broad powers to penalize jurors who disobey court rules, including "improper" conduct or "interfering" with a trial. Thus, as Eric Johnson notes:
The current law seems to cover everything of substance. The only thing the new provision does that I can see is make it a jailable offense to use the internet in such a way that is neither improper nor interfering. I guess I donít understand why we would want to jail jurors under such circumstances.
It seems like a typical grandstanding situation, where a politician feels the need to "do something" about an issue that's been reported on in the press, without realizing nothing needs to be done.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2011 @ 2:03pm

    Re: Good golly, Mike. It's an old standard merely clarified.

    For one who complains often that laws aren't updated, when they are, you complain too.

    "And, to be clear, I'm not entirely sure why it's so bad to talk about a case, in general."

    Mike will, of course, complain no matter what. I agree with you that if Mike is "not entirely sure why it's so bad," then perhaps he should do some research into the matter. Once he understands the arguments, then he can tell us why it's not so bad, which is obviously what he thinks. But that would take work.

    The beauty of working backwards is that all that pesky research becomes unnecessary.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.