by Mike Masnick
Wed, Jul 27th 2011 7:12pm
NFL player Rashard Mendenhall is suing Hanes for dropping his sponsorship deal, after he said some controversial things on Twitter about the Osama bin Laden killing. Hanes points to a "moral clause" that was in its contract with Mendenhall. In response Mendenhall says that he should have a right to express his opinions. I can't see this going very far. Mendenhall certainly has a right to express his opinions, but none of that means that Hanes has to continue working with him. There's some argument that the morals clause is "broad and ambiguous," making it unenforceable, but that seems like a stretch.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Yes, Major Record Labels Are Keeping Nearly All The Money They Get From Spotify, Rather Than Giving It To Artists
- YouTube's Offer To Musicians Isn't As Bad As Some Believe, But YouTube Should Still Change Its Policies
- Regulating Synthetic Biology: Does Freedom Of Speech Apply To DNA Letters?
- Film Academy Sues Family Of Oscar Winner For Selling Trophy On Ebay
- Negotiating Away Innovation: Dish Agrees To Kill Autohop To End TV Blackouts