Congress Condemns Belarus For Doing A Bunch Of Things It Wants To Do

from the seriously? dept

Recently, the House of Representatives passed a resolution condemning Belarus for various human rights violations. It lists out all the various rights violations, and some of them are certainly pretty bad, and I have no doubt that the government of Belarus is doing some highly questionable things. Yet, there’s one section of the resolution that seems especially interesting, given certain actions in Congress lately:

The Government of Belarus has restricted freedom of expression on the Internet by requiring Internet Service Providers to maintain data on Internet users and the sites they view and to provide such data to officials upon request, and by creating a government body with the authority to require Internet Service Providers to block Web sites.

Fascinating. Because, Congress here in the US is currently debating two bills that seem to do exactly that as well. There’s the data retention bill (disguised as an anti-child porn bill) and there’s the PROTECT IP Act, which would give the government power to require ISPs to effectively block web sites. It’s as if Congress doesn’t even realize what it’s doing and what it’s saying.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Congress Condemns Belarus For Doing A Bunch Of Things It Wants To Do”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
55 Comments
RD says:

Do as I say, not as I do (or say)

Of course they dont see the cognitive dissonance here, they are willfully blinding themselves to it. Remember, the rule is the USA can do whatever it wants to whomever it wants, but when the EXACT SAME thing done TO the USA, well thats t’rrism son, and you can expect the full weight of the US Govt and military to come down on you like the wrath of God. See also Wikileaks, those who dont live in the USA and do things that are lawful in their own country (Canada, UK) but arent in the US, and anything China does.

Anonymous Coward says:

I think the key difference is the “upon request” part–presumably in the US the government would need a warrant to obtain the newly retained data.

As for the censorship part, I’d imagine Congress would argue that although it’s creating infrastructure that could be used for the same sort of censorship in the US, the difference lies in the content of the sites to be blocked, and the courts in the US will prevent us from falling down that “slippery slope” (thanks to the First Amendment).

Of course, given how frequently almost everyone engages in using copyrighted content without permission and how expensive going to court is, I’m personally quite afraid of this “slippery slope”; there’s also, of course, the fact that US encouragement of copyright enforcement can give foreign governments a convenient excuse for their own censorship.

I can see though how members of Congress could reasonably believe their positions on Belarus and PROTECT IP are consistent.

LegitTroll (profile) says:

-We need to draft new internet protections for the many content industries which are being destroyed by online piracy. We shall call it Protect IP Act and it will allow us the power to simply remove these rogue websites from the internet.

–What about due process?

-That could take forever to fianlly get through the courts, and who knows how many illegal aliens will steal US jobs while they do it. We must act now.

–What about websites which are based in other nations?

-The interent has no borders. Its just 1s and 0s moving through a series of pipes. There are several rules regarding what falls under this Protect IP Act, and how action is to be taken.

–I have read the Act which I received from your office, and your rules read more like vague generalizations which could be construed to mean a lot more than just these “rouge” website as you call them. You could easily twist some of this language to be used against someone who is doing nothing more than criticizing someone or something. This sounds a lot like the laws of the oppressive regimes which we have lambasted through resolutions and interviews. Most recently Belarus. What makes us different than them if we move forward with this?

-………That is all I have to say on the matter. If you have further inquiries please forward them to my office and my staff will be happy to answer them for you. Good day.

Anonymous Coward says:

The US has very little creditability remaining when pushing for human rights with other countries. Each time they claim something with the internet violates human rights, the other countries now pretty much have an excuse as they point to the US doing the same things and say, “That’s what we’re doing”.

The US is very quickly becoming a police state in it’s own right. The 301 is a laughing joke among other counties. The major ISPs have just agreed to forward notices on infringements without having any necessary proof such is happening. No matter what good face is put on it, the end result of ignoring such warnings is removing you from the net or at best very limited internet. Other countries can now just claim they are looking for their own copyright infringers without having to prove they are actually doing it. Could be political or persecution but will still work out to be the same.

This country could do with a serious dose of reality checks on what human rights are. The UN claims the internet is a human right.

We have the FBI running around doing unchecked surveillance allowing them to put GPS on vehicles, blank check by the courts when they bother to get permission to do so, and watching where cell phones are while monitoring to know where that individual is. All hall marks of the police state.

Homeland Security is just short of ‘the fatherland’ or ‘motherland’, take your pick.

rxrightsadvocate (profile) says:

bitter irony

This is incredibly ironic. Congress needs to start taking notice of the immense opposition to the PROTECT IP Act that has been voiced by lawyers, venture capitalists and various coalitions across the country. One of the major flaws in this bill is that its overarching language fails to distinguish between rogue online pharmacies that do not require valid prescriptions and trusted, safe pharmacies that always do. This bill would take away Americans? access to safe, affordable prescription medications online–even from trusted, legitimate Canadian and other international pharmacies.

RxRights is a national coalition of individuals and organizations dedicated to promoting and protecting American consumer access to sources of safe, affordable prescription drugs. We’re encouraging consumers to send letters to the President and Congress urging them to protect our right to safe and affordable medicine by opposing the PROTECT IP Act. For more information or to voice your concern, visit http://www.RxRights.org.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...