Want To Give Righthaven's Backers A Taste Of Their Own Medicine?
from the getting-meta dept
Okay, I had missed this last week, but this is absolutely hilarious. You may recall, last week we noted the utter hypocrisy of Righthaven’s biggest supporter, Sherman Frederick of the Las Vegas Review Journal, defending Righthaven by blatantly copying articles from the blog GametimeIP.com — and doing so in a manner where it was not at all clear who created the post (I mean, Frederick can’t even figure out how to use quotation marks, let alone something as simple as a blockquote).
If you thought it was already convoluted and twisted enough that Frederick would copy someone else’s blog to defend his support of Righthaven suing other sites for doing the exact same thing to Frederick and others at the LVRJ, it’s now getting even more meta. That’s because, as ken points out, the owner of GametimeIP, Patrick Anderson, who had been inundated with questions about this, has decided to put the copyrights for the three blog posts in question up for sale, so that if someone wants to sue Stephens Media and the LVRJ over Frederick’s potential infringement, they can do so.
In his explanation for why he is doing so, he basically notes (in much more complicated legalese — lawyers!) that some of the folks sued by Righthaven over LVRJ content, may find it useful to sue back, in order to highlight the “inconsistent legal positions” of the LVRJ/Stephens Media. And yes, unlike Stephens Media and Righthaven, he’s apparently willing to sell all of the Section 106 rights to the buyer…
Filed Under: copyright, sherman frederick
Companies: las vegas review-journal, righthaven, stephens media
Comments on “Want To Give Righthaven's Backers A Taste Of Their Own Medicine?”
Only One Word Fits:
“Awesome”
Pure schadenfreude reading each of these Righthaven articles. It just gets better and better…
That’s the kind of crazy that’s good.
I hope someone takes Anderson up on his offer to sell and then opens a professional dialogue with Frederick aimed at affecting a reasonable solution, only after which meaningful litigation may ensue.
. . .
On second thought, just extort the everliving shit out of him.
Smiles
WHEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
The odds will be even
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Re: The odds will be even
Sauce is delicious.
Re: Re: The odds will be even
It will not be hot or even a warm sauce because in this case: “Revenge is a dish best served cold”.
Karma
Karma – it must be a real phenomenon. This is truly cosmic justice at work.
myspace
Myspace sucks!!!
I saw we all buy it and sue.
Kickstarter FTW!
Re: Re:
This . . . is a fantastic idea. I would love to see a “Sue Righthaven!” project on KickStarter. I can imagine the donation levels.
$5 Backer – You get: A photograph of Righthaven CEO Steven Gibson crying into his briefcase as his sham of a career dissolves around him.
Re: Re: Re:
How much for the moire pattern sweater-vest he was sporting in the interview?
Odd question #31567
Just an odd question that may boggle minds around here…
When has it ever been a good idea to sell a “right” you have to anyone else?
I’m looking at the Bill of Rights, along with the Constitution. Out of everything in either document, the ONLY “right” I could see that needs to be taken off is the 16th Amendment.
Imagine if someone sold the right to bear arms.
Imagine if you could sell the right to your free speech to someone else.
And yet somehow, this right to copy aspects of entertainment is allowed to be sold off for income.
How does that make sense?
Re: Odd question #31567
Jay:
Because that?s how property rights work.
Re: Re: Odd question #31567
AC, your answer to a legitimate question is as good as saying “because” without further elaborate. I predict your response to this observation will be “is not.”
Re: Re: Re: Odd question #31567
Elaborate=elaboration (grrr)
Re: Re: Odd question #31567
“Because that?s how [tangible] property rights work.”
FTFY
Re: Re: Re: Odd question #31567
You didn’t fix it, you broke it the techdirt way, by ignoring the obvious and eliminating what you don’t agree with.
Re: Odd question #31567
Well, a copyright is not so much a “right” but an exclusive government granted privilege for certain uses of an artistic work. The grant itself can be transferred to others, similar to the transfer of property ownership. It’s basically the only real legal basis for calling copyright “intellectual property”. Some people however have mistakenly assumed that meant the idea of exclusive property rights applied to all aspects of copyright.
That’s basically the copyright “IP” debate in nutshell.
Re: Odd question #31567
“Imagine if someone sold the right to bear arms.”
Someone… please think of the bears!
Re: Re: Odd question #31567
I still want my goddamned arm-bears.
Re: Re: Re: Odd question #31567
Your wish is my command…
Two of these cuddly critters will be on your doorstep soon. You can supply the chainsaw.. if you can bear it (or they don’t eat you first)
Australias adorable Drop Bear(courtesy Australian Museum)
Re: Odd question #31567
Dude, “rights” are gotten all sorts of ways. They stem from laws, only one source of which is the Constitution. Your pinched view of the word just fails. And I’m with you on the copyright part–I’m just saying: don’t over-simplify to get to the good point.
If anyone buys it they should file with the exact same wording as Righthaven lawsuits including the domain name of the LVRJ and computers etc and $150,0000 in “irreparable damages”. Then call them and tell them it is a lot cheaper to settle than fight it.
It is funny… but I would worry about RightHaven buying the copyright directly or by proxy. Make sure to vet your customers.
A poem...
My name is Righthaven
my job is to sue
rights have been given
so you I will screw
I have no real right
but why would that stop me
in court I will fight
’cause no one should copy
We’re arrogant pricks
we act quite obtuse
a lawsuit that sticks
will destroy your fair use
*Feel free to add to this. Claim it as your own if you need to. Have fun!
Re: A poem...
There once was a dickhead named Gibson
On TV he seems sort of glib, son
His sweater reflected, bullshit was detected
Hope the court hangs him high by the jib, son.
Re: Re: A poem...
Righthaven is in quite a jam.
Turns out that it’s “Right” was a sham.
But the judge saw Right through
And told Gibson to screw
Bloggers blogging? We don’t give a damn.
So I wonder who will buy: Sherman Frederick, Stephens Media or Righthaven?
Could be an interesting bidding war to watch.
Really? Even some of the ACs in the comments at this blog know how to use blockquote…
Frederick
This is a nice web site. Good fresh interface and nice informative articles. I will be coming back soon, thanks for the great article.keep it up.