Former Obama Advisor Says Wikileaks Is Wonderful For The US Government

from the if-only-he-would-tell-Obama-that dept

While the White House seems to be doing whatever it possibly can to try to file charges against folks involved in Wikileaks, a former Obama adviser is talking up how wonderful Wikileaks has been for the US government, in that it's helped people understand the "challenges" the US faces. Mike Nelson who at one point was White House director for technology policy on IT says that the US government shouldn't hate Wikileaks for the release of all those State Department documents:
“The US diplomats actually came out looking pretty good because the same thing they were saying in private was the same thing they were saying in public," he said.

"The data that was divulged provided a lot of the justification for policies that the US government had been undertaking for years."

Nelson said that the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, held a press conference to denounce WikiLeaks as a fraud because of leaked cables describing meetings between US ambassadors and heads of state in Oman, Kuwait, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.

"Memo after memo said, 'The head of state reports that the guy across the [Persian] Gulf is crazy and they want the US government to do something about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad'," Nelson said.

"In public the heads of state would never say that, which was why Ahmadinejad concluded the memos were fake because he thought he was well-loved by his Arab brothers.

"Releasing this information is giving people a better understanding of the challenges that [US] foreign policy makers face."
Later, he said that he hoped such revelations from Wikileaks would lead to more open discussions by governments, rather than trying to keep everything secret.
"If there is a corrupt official taking million dollar bribes from the Russians, maybe that should be public knowledge rather than hidden in a WikiLeaks cable?" he said.
I assume he meant a State Department cable, but the point makes a lot of sense. Too bad so few people in government seem to agree.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: mike nelson, us government, wikileaks
Companies: wikileaks


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    sam sin, 13 Jun 2011 @ 5:39am

    and the reason there are so few people in government that agree is because they are the ones taking the bribes!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Jun 2011 @ 5:49am

    So you'll just grab onto any argument, no matter how tenuous, and give it conclusive weight to support your views? That's not good for the old credibility, you know. Are you really going to adopt the position that "the same thing they were saying in private was the same thing they were saying in public"? That seems to directly contradict what you've said before. But hey, he's saying the leaks were OK, so why not go with it, whatever his reasoning? Working backwards in action, my friends.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      AJ, 13 Jun 2011 @ 6:03am

      Re:

      "I assume he meant a State Department cable, but the point makes a lot of sense. Too bad so few people in government seem to agree."

      Were you talking about Mike giving the above statement "conclusive weight"? How exactly did you come to that from from Mike's "makes a lot of sense" statement? Or am I feeding the Trolls again...?


      You do realize that this is a blog, and as such is full of both fact, and Mike's opinions right?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Jason, 13 Jun 2011 @ 6:13am

        Re: Re:

        "Were you talking about Mike giving the above statement "conclusive weight"? How exactly did you come to that from from Mike's "makes a lot of sense" statement?"

        That's not good for the old credibility, you know.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    johnjac (profile), 13 Jun 2011 @ 5:50am

    but... but...

    but ... but... LEAKS!!!!!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      xenomancer (profile), 13 Jun 2011 @ 6:12am

      Re: but... but...

      Counterfeiters, whistle-blowers, and pirates! Oh my!
      Counterfeiters, whistle-blowers, and pirates! Oh my!
      Counterfeiters, whistle-blowers, and pirates! Oh my!

      (the chant of executives and officials who want to enshroud their lives in secrecy and lock up as much content as possible while foaming at the mouth for everyone else to lay bare their life's details)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Kevin (profile), 13 Jun 2011 @ 6:07am

    As loathe as I am to agree with an AC

    This is ridiculous. I don't specifically recall what you've said about Wikileaks in the past, so I won't claim you're contradicting yourself, because I simply don't know. But this doesn't seem like one lone-wolf gov't official disagreeing with the gov't at large about the official WH actions toward Wikileaks. Rather, this looks, as usual, like a calculated piece of PR released to all-to-eager stenographer-journalists who publish anything a "qualified source" tells them.

    Anyone who has read reporting on those cables (or better yet, read them directly, though who has time) has seen numerous examples of embarrassing situation after embarrassing situation caused by flat out lies they make plain, particularly with respect to policies in the ME. While it's certainly true, in the barest respect, that other ME leaders that we're more friendly with are excited about the idea that we might depose Iran's regime, the fact that a few cables prove they're bouncing up and down about it certainly does NOT validate everything our saber-rattling leaders have said regarding Iran in the last few years. If anything, it just underscores that we're itching to go to war with them and everyone in that region knows it.

    I'm sorry, but this seems like the same pattern of "Bush says there are WMDs in Iraq, and we know because Cheney went on Meet the Press and confirmed it" type reporting, and I'm sad to see that a reporter I'm normally thrilled with (even in an off publication that won't make much difference in this case, since it's not geared toward political reporting) missing this obvious underlying theme.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Planespotter (profile), 13 Jun 2011 @ 6:09am

    Typo... unless wikipedia has started to leak emails?

    shouldn't hate Wikipedia for the release of all those State Department documents:

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    fogbugzd (profile), 13 Jun 2011 @ 6:15am

    Wikileaks has drawn the wrath of the US government because it flies in the face of two principles that have infected both big business and government. The first is an obsessive need to feel in control of everything. The second is the idea that the rules and standards you demand that everyone else follow do not apply to you.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Jun 2011 @ 6:54am

    Expect this official to be ...

    Uhm... whatever happened to him. No one has heard from him in a long time.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Jun 2011 @ 7:52am

    ""I assume he meant a State Department cable"

    No, he meant Wikileaks cable. He basically was saying that he hopes corruption would be spotlighted with public knowledge ahead of time, instead of people finding out about it through Wikileaks.

    This is why you shouldn't try to play Mr. Decipher and put words in other people's mouths.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 13 Jun 2011 @ 10:38am

      Re:

      We all know he hears what he wants to hear, no matter what was actually said. Some might call it wishful thinking, but I call it faithful ignorance.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Any Mouse (profile), 13 Jun 2011 @ 10:59am

      Re:

      Since Wikileaks weren't the originators of the cables, the State Department was, I have to assume you're just trolling to be a troll, and really have nothing substantial to add to the conversation.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Mike54 (profile), 13 Jun 2011 @ 1:03pm

    truth...

    it seems you admit what Ahmadinejad has said about the aim of publishing these documents. he didn't say these are fake but he said they issued intentionaly to make discord between Arabs and Iran. he is so smart that didn't fall in US's trap and said there is not any conflict between Iran and it's neighbors. surly he doesn't think they really love him!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    boo boo, 13 Jun 2011 @ 4:13pm

    All that and a Bag Of Worms from This Rogue Administration...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mike Kevitt, 13 Jun 2011 @ 8:10pm

    WiliLeaks

    The gv't. surely classifies things that need.'t, and so shouldn't, be classified, plus it oughta be able to keep a lid on classified data in the Internet age. But, none of this excuses WikiLeaks, the press or the media for usurping the function of law, gv't. and due process, which is what private entities are to work thru concerning such issues. The press and media have, in principle, been treasonous. The Australian gv't., an ally of the U.S., has power over its own citizens' criminal activities. Maybe it should be stepping on WikiLeaks. Freedom of speech and press, etc., doesn't apply to crime.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Shine (profile), 20 Oct 2011 @ 11:22pm

    who?

    I guess I lost track of this news already. Did they actually find out who did the "leaking"?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Andrew, 14 Jan 2012 @ 8:39am

    Are there new Wikileaks out?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    lrobbo (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 11:08am

    Don't think they did.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Advertisment

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.