Reminder: Please Help Us Calculate The 'Cost' Of Overprotective Copyright Laws
from the estimation-is-good dept
A quick reminder here. After a Senate-commission report by the US ITC concerning “losses” from China due to intellectual property infringement, we noted that the methodology was ridiculous. The ITC simply went out and asked some of the biggest companies who rely on IP how much they thought they “lost,” and used that to extrapolate a number. In what world is it the appropriate methodology to ask those who would financially benefit the most from greater protectionism to provide accurate data about the need for that protectionism? However, if that methodology is considered credible for the US Senate and the ITC, we figured we might as well use the identical methodology to calculate the “loss” the public has dealt with due to overprotective copyright laws. Of course, unlike the ITC, we actually asked people to “be reasonable.” You can provide your own thoughts in the form below:
Comments on “Reminder: Please Help Us Calculate The 'Cost' Of Overprotective Copyright Laws”
The cost of things not purchased
If the BSA can claim that “if they hadn’t violated copyright, we would have earned $ABSURD_MONEY (even if they would never have purchased it otherwise)”, I guess I can claim that “if copyright hadn’t been ridiculously extended, I wouldn’t have to spend $ABSURD_MONEY on things that would be otherwise free.” So I guess that means that hyperextended copyright has cost me $ABSURD_MONEY. Why don’t we call it a wash and return to the original terms of copyright?
Abolish Copyright!
How do you put “a metric shitton” in a numerical format?
Can I use stats from another country showing how important sharing and creation of derivative works is to a healthy market?
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-japan-d-avatar-real-world.html
Miku is a virtual artist, that has more than 30 thousand songs performed by her and she even get to play live thanks to the magic of modern technology.
Quote:
Using that as a base of what is being lost in cultural terms I would say I lost something in the ballpark of $1.5 million dollars due not to being able to access 150 thousands works not created that would cost $10 bucks each.
Am I not being reasonable?
Re:
poo(.90720) = 1 metric shitton
My Annual "Losses"
In the interest of being funny, because I am almost certain my analysis will be tossed as a humorous outlier, here is how I (hastily) calculated my “losses” over the past year:
Also, here are the sources I forgot to list in the submission:
1) http://www.the-numbers.com/market/movies2010.php
2) http://www1.salary.com/Chemical-Engineer-V-Salary.html
*I may have fudged the division by 2 for hours per movie, but its still perfectly within the ridiculous MPAA method of determining “losses” due to “piracy.”
**To perform the calculation yourself, remove all the units and it should be a straight forward scientific calculator nightmare.
***This formula assumes no music was listened to, nor any music value was consumed during the movies, nor any additional value from the works licensed to the studio by their IP paranoia department, nor any other extraneous factors aside my insomnia, just the movies were counted based on average earnings.
Re: My Annual "Losses"
“*I may have fudged the division by 2 for hours per movie, but its still perfectly within the ridiculous MPAA method of determining “losses” due to “piracy.”
Actually since you can’t get past the piracy warnings and what not it probably turns out to be about 2hrs each unless you watch any of the Lord of the Rings movies!
My Annual "Losses"
I suppose I ought to include the cultural cost of software, music, and any other copyrighted media I can think of in my analysis. OOOO, and litigation costs. But that’s a bit much work to do for this, the cost might become a self-fulfilling recursion toward infinity.
My Annual "Losses"
Wait, what about the two weeks extra holiday? Doesn’t your free time count double then?
I have no idea if the way I am doing this is any good, but I will try to give some sort of value. I am just sort of worried that it will be a bit… insane. I don’t know if I am doing it right.
Re:
The original study’s methodology was insane, even by an Asylum member’s standards. This is showing how insane that logic is.
Re: Re:
Just as long as the courts eat it up.. mmm, Yum Yum Yum..
Dont for get the lawyers..
Along with all the estimates, you have to ADD in the Lawyers.
Those guys getting TONS of money to sit around and wait for the Industry to POINT a finger..
My Annual "Losses"
The Best thing about your post is that the actual methodology you used is believable…
Well, more than the one “they” used.
Dont for get the lawyers..
…which takes money out of creators pockets! No wonder they keep bribing Congress for harsher laws! Tbhey get to make more money to profit!!!
How about....
.. a better calculation of how much revenue the companies are loosing due to their inability to provide the content with the same quality and availability that their less desirable counter parts are able to achieve without the technical expertise for hire or the bankroll available?
One MILLION Dollars!!! MUHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
DRM is saving me a fortune!
DRM is saving me a fortune! After being burned repeatedly in 2006, I gave up and now I pirate everything. On the off chance I actually need to buy a CD or DVD or piece of software, I have all the free DRM circumvention tools you can name. They were all free.
It has saved me a fortune on buying things and I’ve saved even more money on shelf space. This is also good for the environment as my shelves were wooden, thus no more trees need to be felled for my collection to be stored.
Oh, you mean how much has DRM cost me in terms of culture? Well, I was buying some Jazz CD’s filled with Public Domain recordings from Naxos allowing me to hear 1930’s jazz I had never heard before until our copyright law got extended in 2006 and now I can’t get them anymore….. Not legally anyway.