by Mike Masnick
Mon, May 23rd 2011 9:57pm
Verizon and Cablevision have been involved in an intense battle for years over broadband customers on Long Island. So it really wasn't a huge surprise when Verizon tried to up the ante by suing Cablevision for patent infringement concerning DVR technology. It was pretty clear the lawsuit had nothing whatsoever to do with Cablevision actually copying Verizon. It was just a way to attack a competitor via the courts. Oh, and of course, Verizon got two cracks at Cablevision because it used the ITC loophole, as well. Thankfully, the ITC seems to have come to its senses, of late, and is being pretty tough on patent claims. And, in this case, it's come down against Verizon, saying that Cablevision didn't infringe on four of the five patents. The fifth? That one didn't matter because a court (in Eastern Texas, believe it or not) had ruled that the patent was invalid. It seems this particular anti-competitive usage of patents didn't get very far.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- ISP Can't Figure Out How To Automate A Password Reset, But Is Happy To E-mail Your Password In Plain Text
- Why Patent Trolls Love East Texas... And Why Congress Needs To Fix It
- Verizon Quietly Backs Off Throttling 'Unlimited' Wireless Customers, But Only After It No Longer Matters
- Comcast Admits Broadband Usage Caps Are A Cash Grab, Not An Engineering Necessity
- Verizon Thinks It's A Good Idea To Mock New Jersey Taxpayers After Ripping Them Off For Years