Techdirt Files FOIA Requests Concerning ICE 'Anti-Piracy' Videos
from the digging-in dept
Earlier today, I filed three Freedom of Information requests concerning the infamous “anti-piracy PSA” that Homeland Security’s ICE division started placing on domains it seized. As we noted at the time, the videos were not new and not created by ICE. Instead, they were part of a campaign put together by New York City with the help of NBC Universal and the MPAA. The scripts of the videos were misleading, and I was troubled by the idea that the federal government would be playing corporately produced and funded propaganda, with the imprimatur of the Department of Homeland Security. I asked a series of friendly (non-aggressive) questions to Brian Hale, officially the spokesperson for ICE within the Department of Homeland Security about where they got the video and how much was paid for it. Hale and Homeland Security apparently decided not to comment at all, despite multiple email requests.
Separately, I made requests to the City of New York, to get their side of the story, but after being asked who I was reporting for, what “the nature” of my story was and who else I was talking to (all of which I answered honestly), I received no further response from the City of New York.
Thus, the three Freedom of Information requests — filed using the new system from MuckRock.com, an open government tool that seeks to publish documents retrieved via such requests and which recently built a tool to make it easier to make such requests (which I’m now testing) — are as follows:
- A FOIA request to the Department of Homeland Security, concerning the details of any licensing agreement with the City of New York or with NBC Universal directly.
- A request under NY State’s Freedom of Information Law concerning details of any licensing agreement with Homeland Security concerning the same videos.
- Separately, a second request to NYC, concerning communications between the Mayor’s Office and NBC Universal or the MPAA concerning the details behind those videos as well
The NY State law says that the city must respond to my request within five business days. DHS has a longer period of time to respond. Honestly, it’s silly that I had to file such requests. Homeland Security could have easily cleared this up weeks ago by answering my simple questions concerning how the federal government licensed this video. The fact that it has refused to do so necessitated this formal approach, unfortunately.
Filed Under: dhs, foia, freedom of information, new york city
Companies: mpaa, nbc universal
Comments on “Techdirt Files FOIA Requests Concerning ICE 'Anti-Piracy' Videos”
LOL
“hey Bob, that guy that writes the piracy love blog is on the phone again…”
Re: Re:
Hey Bob, another anonymous troll is trying to make fun of TD and failing miserably.
Re: Re: Re:
LOL
“hey Bob, that guy thinks the word freetard is offensive to the handi-capable…”
Re: Re: Re: Re:
LOL
Maybe if you LOL enough you’ll increase your self esteem to the level that most human beings achieve in the 8th grade.
(and yes, I LOL’ed too because I’m also mentally stuck in the 8th grade — or thereabouts)
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Considering that I /am/ handicapped (wheelchair most of the time and legally blind), I should take offense to that. It’s difficult to, however, with the person behind that comment among the mentally challenged.
Re: Re: Re:
Hey Bob (most popular guy in the office?), weneedhelp doesn’t like a wee jokey joke it turns out.
Re: Re:
“Thanks for the heads up, Joe. Better pay some more shills to troll his blog.”
Re: Response
> “hey Bob, that guy that writes the piracy
> love blog is on the phone again…”
So you’re suggesting the government should only respond to publications with whose point of view it agrees?
Despite being granted no such discretion in the FOIA law?
Re: Re: Response
no he is saying that if the person requesting disagrees with they they can ignore him until he makes a FOIA request. Then they can tell him it costs $100,000 to get a team of interns to track down what he wants, redact everything but pronouns, and make a copy.
Only give information to people that agree with you unless otherwise forced by stupid “law.” Sharing information leads to informed debate which is the last thing we want. Besides pirates share information, you dont want to be a pirate do you?
Re: Re: Response
> So you’re suggesting the government should
> only respond to publications with whose point
> of view it agrees?
No. He’s suggesting that the government is so deeply connected with the copyright maximalists that they call them to laugh about a lawful FOIA request.
I filed three Freedom of Information requests
You’re on the list.
Re: I filed three Freedom of Information requests
Mike, I hate to say it, but that was my first thought as well. My next thought was “/unsubscribe”, for which I am not proud.
Re: I filed three Freedom of Information requests
Which is good, because with the potential offender* filing information requests the government officials now have “documented proof of subversive activities” toward the government. Which makes it easier to legally fight the offender* when the offender* complains or attempts to sue after finding the newly hidden GPS tracker under his/her car.
Which was placed there using completely legitimate “court documents” that just happen to be filed over… ummmm… hmmm… well that isn’t important, we’ll get back to you on the location later.
(*subnote offender: see entry for ‘anyone who questions government activities or actions’ in local references)
–sarcasm over, returning to your normally scheduled program–
Not happening
Nope. Not going to happen. Those documents and anything else of the government are related to National Security.
Re: Not happening
Maybe wikileaks can leak a classified document concerning a governmental evaluation over how many federal agencies it takes to screw in a light bulb?
Re: Re: Not happening
No need. It takes five government agencies and sixteen defense contractors. First they have to evaluate the national security impact of the bulb, the socket, the wiring, and each and every photon. Then they have to evaluate the amount of electricity, where it’s coming from, how the bulb got there, who made the socket, the bulb, the filament, and the wall mount. They need to make sure classified information isn’t going to leak through the bulb in the form of infrared heat. They they get the sixteen contractors to do the work, design the system of screwing in the bulb appropriately, and then evaluate it’s functioning for the next thirty-six years, thereby costing the taxpayers about $1.2 trillion dollars….
But it will create a few jobs… so the plan is a success. Hooray!
Re: Re: Re: Not happening
Now we just need to figure out how many federal agencies it takes to answer this FOIA request. Maybe another leak is in order to answer that question.
Re: Re: Re:2 Not happening
Twelve federal agencies, three Senators and Cleetus the Slack-jawed Yokel.
Re: Re: Re: Not happening
Actually it depends on the agency.
Some of them have been working in the dark for years now.
No light bulbs necessary.
Re: Re: Not happening
Better to ask for government documents concerning federal documents, programs, research into how many Federal Agencies it takes to screw in a light bulb and the taxpayer cost of each report. $1.2 trllion per year as appropriated by Congress for each Federal Department to have their own maintainace department – ignoring each department has their own appropriations department to buy a light bulb which costs anywhere between $80 to $0.39 depending on how, where, and allowed to buy.
"Techdirt Files..."
Isn’t it more like “Mike Masnick files”?
Re: "Techdirt Files..."
For a minute I thought that said “flies” and I was like OH MY GOD FLYING PIRATES. Phew… Anyway what is your point exactly?
Re: "Techdirt Files..."
By that thinking, we should start assigning personal names to actions of the music and movie industries to manipulate the government.
I certain
You’ll likely get results in 10 to 36 months.
Re: I certain
Hope he doesn’t have to wait that long. By that point Masnick will likely have had an aneurysm due to increased record sales…
Re: Re: I certain
Still holding your breath in hopes that killing Limewire will save the recording industry? We may have to call Guinness by the time that’s done.
Re: Re: Re: I certain
“Save” the record industry? LOL
Hate to break this to ya bud, but your best chance to “kill the recording industry” was about 7-8 years ago.
And it didn’t happen.
And it quite obviously isn’t going to happen now.
boo-hoo 🙁
Re: Re: Re:2 I certain
So, “Piracy” isn’t a problem, then?
Re: Re: Re:3 I certain
only if it being a problem aids him in insulting people
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
He is an insult to people with aids, I concur.
Re: Re: Re:3 I certain
Anytime someone else is making money off my work instead of me, we have a problem.
But we’re getting that problem addressed.
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
So piracy’s not a problem then? After all if I pirate your stuff, all I’m doing is listening to it, not making any money off it.
Right?
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
oooohh you are one of those guys that thinks pirates are making money off of pirating
no wonders everything you say sounds so stupid
Re: Re: Re:5 I certain
Didn’t you know? Pirates go around stealing hundreds of songs from wayward musicians, then they put them in a chest and bury it on a remote island until the statute of limitations has passed. Then they follow their map, dig it up and live in luxury for the rest of their days.
Re: Re: Re:6 I certain
Not enough Accountancy Shanty.
Re: Re: Re:5 I certain
oooohh you are one of those guys that thinks pirates are making money off of pirating
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Gorton
Re: Re: Re:6 I certain
ok so you have an example of one guy who tried to make money of off other people infringing….
remind me, how did that work out for him?
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
So the recording industry is a problem for musicians? Good to know.
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
Yeah, right.
Re: Re: Re:2 I certain
Honestly, you’re right (probably unintentionally). The recording industry is not just the RIAA and their labels, but a larger group of people that will always be needed. If copyright was abolished tomorrow and downloading songs was legalized, the recording industry wouldn’t flinch, the music industry wouldn’t flinch. The RIAA would die a horrible, flaming death, and reality would just shrug them off like the bad idea they are. The music will still flow and so will the money.
Re: Re: Re:3 I certain
The RIAA is a non-profit trade organization.
Care to try again?
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
RIAA is a non-profit
Yeah, and the mob doesn’t exist.
I’ll give you that on paper, “legally” they’re non-profit. But that’s just because the labels needed a non-profit group to funnel all that money to politicians.
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
It’s also shorthand for the labels affiliated with them. Try to keep up.
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
“The RIAA is a non-profit trade organization.”
and scientology is a religion
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
NO WHERE do I find that that RIAA is a non-profit. Trade organizations can be for profit, non-profit, or not for profit. All three have differences. Care to cite where the RIAA is a non-profit?
Re: Re: Re:5 I certain
go to Guidestar and look at their 990
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
“The RIAA is a non-profit trade organization.”
All that means is that they don’t pay taxes.
Re: Re: Re:4 I certain
So that union-busting law in Wisconsin would actually break the RIAA? SWEET!
Re: Re: Re:2 I certain
Hate to break this to ya bud, but your best chance to “kill the recording industry” was about 7-8 years ago.
If I wasn’t at work, I’d find a Youtube link to the Monty Python “I’m not dead yet” scene.
…I feel happy! I feeeeeeeel happy! I feeeeeeel
Re: Re: Re:3 I certain
I think Ill go for a walk…
you’re not fooling anyone!
Re: Re: Re:2 I certain
Strange then that I have never seen a record sold in the last 7yrs.. all I see are crappy CD’s by wannabee marketing hyped artists using computers to mask that they cannot actually sing…
When we had ‘records’ at least we could get some good, though expensive, music by the ‘recording industry’ since they were not wasting all their money on their egos, or legal fishing expeditions and instead spent it on the actual music industry and strategic positioning.. ie: Not going to Youtube/***IDOL to grab the latest wannabee star
The Music Industry will never die, humanity has too much of a cultural history with music. The Recording Industry on the other hand.. Ever seen what happens when you cut a chickens head off? Just before it falls over stone dead and plucked.. it races around all over the p[lace doing nothing much but spewing out gore and bile onto anything it touches.
Re: Re: I certain
By that point Masnick will likely have had an aneurysm due to increased record sales…
ROTFLMAO! You actually believe that bull your touting? Hilarious.
Re: I certain
Only because the information would have already leaked by then. No point in not releasing it once its leaked.
Re: Re: I certain
Actually once it leaks it’s even more important to pretend it’s secret and demand that everybody pretend it doesn’t exist.
FOIA Request
Do you have to be a journalist to file an FOIA request? Why does that have anything to do with anything? Shouldn’t I, as a regular citizen, be able to file one just for the hell of it?
Re: FOIA Request
The answer to your first question is “no”.
To your second “nothing”.
To your third “yes”.
Bear in mind that FOIA is the name associated with the federal government.
Each state generally has its own nomenclature.
Re: FOIA Request
Anyone can file a FOIA but depending on what you ask for you may end up paying for the reproduction cost of what you are looking for unless you can justify a wavier of cost.
Aren't they the ones?
Isn’t it them and their blind followers who are always saying that if you haven’t done anything wrong then you have nothing to hide when they are pushing for more transparency in our daily lives?
Interesting that they wouldn’t respond then when we are asking them to be open about operations that are funded with OUR tax dollars.
Re: Aren't they the ones?
“if you haven’t done anything wrong then you have nothing to hide”
that is why they hide so much
*waits for TD homepage to be replaced with ICE anti-piracy PSA*
Re: Re:
I chuckled too, but seriously, who here with an ounce of sense (sorry Joe) doesn’t believe that is exactly what will happen the day after PROTIP or one of its clones is passed? I need to jot down TD’s IP address…
Response time
FOIA allows 5 days to not actually provide a response to the questions, just an acknowledgement of receipt of request and an estimated cost to the inquisitor (staff time to recover information, copies, etc., if any) and date when the pertinent information is available to you. Or a rejection. Keep your fingers crossed.
Bravo
Although you cannot see it, I am standing up and applauding your efforts. I look forward to the results.
So if this video is hosted on a government site, can it be taken down by ICE, because that would truly be funny.
Re: Bravo
Are you typing with your feet then?
Re: Re: Bravo
Since most keyboards are on a desk that’s about waist-high, I shudder to think what he’s typing with.
So they come back someday and send info, so what?
Prediction:
1. The government will attempt to block MuckRock.com, presumably by declaring that they arbitrarily don’t have to obey FOIA requests associated with them.
2. A lawsuit (with the support of interested parties like the EFF) will, after a lengthy court battle, declare that the government does, in fact, have to respond to FOIA requests.
3. The government will try somewhere between 0 and 3 more attempts to get out of responding to the FOIA requests. Each time, it will be decided (at taxpayer’s expense) that they do, in fact, have to respond to FOIA requests.
4. After kicking and screaming for months, the government will finally give in and respond to the FOIA requests, which will reveal nothing particularly controversial.
What happens when they present a bill for $1,000,000?
So what happens when they say that it will cost an absurd amount of money to hand over the information?
ICE Technological Prowess
You have to remember who we’re dealing with here. ICE is not even capable of generating a random number!
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9216721/Computer_glitch_forces_U.S._to_cancel_visa_lottery_results
Re: ICE Technological Prowess
Wait…
You mean to tell me, we have a lottery to allow people in the US…
We don’t get them for any skill…
We don’t get them for any number of jobs that they might be good for society…
We get them because they had the most luck.
*facepalm*
Re: Re: ICE Technological Prowess
Hey, if it works for Europe…
Do they have it?
Does the DHS have a license to show the video? Or should http://www.dhs.gov be put on notice
Gee
A true journalist, jumping in to defend the rights of pirates everywhere. Awesome.
Re: Gee
A true journalist, jumping in to defend the rights of pirates everywhere. Awesome.
Odd statement. This has nothing to do with defending piracy.