RSS
Putting Up A Paywall Just To Have Advertisers Pay To Take It Down?
from the suckers-bet? dept
There's an interesting article at AdAge noting that while there are various paywalls going up, there are also a growing number of advertisers willing to pay to take down the paywall... and they're willing to pay more than it would have cost to just advertise. For example, Lincoln "paid" for a bunch of people to get the new NY Times' paywall for free, and Volvo is paying for a bunch of people to get free streaming video of Major League Baseball content. What strikes me as amusing about all of this is that the folks putting up these paywalls keep insisting that "advertising alone" can't pay enough... and yet here they are more or less admitting that advertisers are happy to pay "enough," if they're given a promotional package that brings benefits to them. Of course, the silly part of this is that part of that "benefit" to the advertisers is the perception that they're helping people take down the paywall. If that's really true, perhaps we should set up a paywall here at Techdirt just so some advertisers can "pay" to take it down. Any interest? Let us know...
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Why isn't this the norm?
Especially considering with online advertising, the advertiser can get a ridiculously clear and accurate picture of their return. 'Stead of the same ol' 50% wasted. Seems to me such targeted & known space is much, much more valuable.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why isn't this the norm?
Therein lies the problem, news organizations never ever counted on accurate pictures to sell ads they relied on fantastic assumptions to increase the prices and get the money, now they can't do that anymore.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Great Wall Of China
This is no Great Wall Of China, just Great Wall of Whiner.
I think New York Times always complaining they can't make enough money, just a lot of FOO. Shame on you!
Everything in China free, and look .... we take over the world.
No worries, soon we buy New York Times just for laughs,
he he ho ho ;)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great Wall Of China
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great Wall Of China
he he ho ho ;)
You could probably get a good deal right now. I understand they just invested a considerable sum in a tech project that ultimately panned out.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Generous Offer
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Paywall
1) you come in through a link from somewhere else
2) you have visited TechDirt less than 20 times today
3) you have turned off JavaScript (careful though - this may be a DMCA violation)
4) your computer has a keyboard
5) or your computer is a tablet
6) it is sunny outside
7) you drive a hybrid car (tip out hats to eco-friendly people - Google knows who you are and share this information with us)
8) it is rainy outside but warm
9) you have NOT downloaded illegal music this week
Subscription costs are:
- $9.99 per month
- for the bargain hunter - $125 per year
- an extra $4.99 per month for the iPad app
- an extra $3.99 per month for access through an Android app
- an extra $10 per month for access from any device except a Boost Mobile phone
- the full digital package is free (except the iPad app) if you subscribe to the paper version of TechDirt delivered Tuesday and Thursday to your doorstep for $8.25 per month
- You can get the iPad app with the paper subscription for $9.99 per month
Just give us your credit card and tell us what you want to use - we will figure out the charges for you.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Paywall
Good summary, btw.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Paywall
Talk about a bargain!
Mike - call me. We'll talk.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
(mis)quoting Forest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does".
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Any interest? Let us know...
I'll build you a paywall, Mike. I'll only charge half as much as it cost the NY Times to put theirs in place, I'll do it in a month, and it will be of the same quality as a multi-billion dollar media company can do.
Now, off to Amazon to buy a JavaScript for Dummies book...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe the NYT did this on purpose because they want more money and figure that advertisers would be willing to give them more money for removing the paywall if they put one up.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment