by Mike Masnick
Wed, Mar 16th 2011 3:00am
We recently wrote about an attempt by one of the growing number of mass P2P pre-settlement lawsuit lawyers, John Steele, to file a reverse of defendant class action lawsuit to try to get around the issue of misjoinder in combining a bunch of totally unrelated individuals in a single lawsuit. Typically, of course, class action lawsuits involve a class as the "plaintiff" not the defendant. It's not unheard of to have a defendant class action, but it is rare. Either way, the judge doesn't seem to be buying it. In a recent hearing the judge noted that the whole thing felt like a fishing expedition, and barred the court from issuing any subpoenas until an adversarial hearing was held. It's unclear who will represent the still anonymous "class," but hopefully the judge takes a note from another court and brings in experts like Public Citizen and the EFF.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Malibu Media Copyright Troll Wakes The Beast In Trying To Push Verizon Around
- Judge Tells CBP That It Certainly CAN Be Sued For Its FOIA Response Foot Dragging
- DOJ Reasserts Its Right To Engage In Seized Data Fishing Expeditions
- Sony Pictures, Which Hyped Up 'Harm' Of Hack, Now Tells Court No Harm Done To Employees
- Illinois Attorney Discipline Board Finally Moves Against Prenda Mastermind John Steele