by Mike Masnick
Fri, Mar 4th 2011 5:22pm
In what seems like a very dangerous ruling, antithetical to basic anonymity rights, a magistrate judge has ruled that Sony can unmask anyone who visited GeoHot's website where he had posted the jailbreak data or who viewed the YouTube video that demonstrated the jailbreak for the PS3 that allowed PS3 owners to bring back a feature that Sony had killed off. This seems pretty extreme. Why is it okay to identify people just because they visited a website or watched a video? As the EFF noted, these subpoenas seem extremely broad, and it's disappointing that the judge signed off on them.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Appeals Court Says Filming The Police Is Protected By The First Amendment
- Pro-Marijuana Student Organization Wins Court Case Over Using School Logos
- Court: Unsupported Assertions And Broad Language Aren't Enough To Support Cell Phone Searches
- Court Points Out Numerous Ways Using Playstation Network To Trade Child Porn Is A Bad Idea
- Bug Related To HDCP DRM Is Giving New Playstation PS4 Pro Owners Headaches