by Mike Masnick
Fri, Mar 4th 2011 5:22pm
In what seems like a very dangerous ruling, antithetical to basic anonymity rights, a magistrate judge has ruled that Sony can unmask anyone who visited GeoHot's website where he had posted the jailbreak data or who viewed the YouTube video that demonstrated the jailbreak for the PS3 that allowed PS3 owners to bring back a feature that Sony had killed off. This seems pretty extreme. Why is it okay to identify people just because they visited a website or watched a video? As the EFF noted, these subpoenas seem extremely broad, and it's disappointing that the judge signed off on them.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Newsday Editor: Carve Hate Speech Out Of First Amendment, Hold Websites Responsible If Users Post Hate Speech
- A Gronking To Remember Lawsuit Gets Strange While Amazon Argues Liability Would Chill Speech And Art
- ICANN's War On Whois Privacy
- Sony Uses Copyright To Force Verge To Takedown Its Copy Of Sony's Spotify Contract
- Chris Dodd Implies US Gov't Should Go After Wikileaks For Publishing Leaked Sony Emails