by Mike Masnick
Mon, Feb 21st 2011 1:59pm
I'm sort of amazed at the silly and childish political games being played concerning attempts to cut funding here and there, but, seriously can anyone give me a logical explanation why the same folks who are so quick to demand that we stop funding NPR and PBS are so vehemently in favor of sponsoring NASCAR? Frankly, as a fan of both NPR and PBS, but not a fan of governments overspending, I actually think the complaints against pulling the funding from both are a bit overblown. I think there are some creative things that both NPR and PBS could do to make up the difference if they lost federal funding. However, if we are going to cut public broadcasting, then it seems only reasonable to cut sponsoring NASCAR as well, doesn't it? I'm curious how folks who claim to support smaller government are defending such sponsorship of a private, for-profit operation with taxpayer funding?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hack Of Federal Gov't Employee Info Is Much, Much Worse Than Originally Stated: Unencrypted Social Security Numbers Leaked
- Amendment Blocking Backdoor Searches, Backdooring Encryption To Be Added To Defense Funding Bill
- US CIO Orders All .Gov Websites To Require Encrypted Connections, Amazon Enters The Secure Cert Space
- Congress Continues To Withhold Congressional Research Service Documents From The Public
- Chief Information Officers Council Proposes HTTPS By Default For All Federal Government Websites