Why Is Google Fighting So Hard To Keep Filing... >>
<< DailyDirt: Alternative Energy
 tdicon 

Politics

by Mike Masnick

Tue, Feb 15th 2011 6:01pm


Filed Under:
patriot act, senate



Senate Extends Controversial Patriot Act Spying Provisions By 90 Days; But Will They Debate Them During That Time?

from the questions-to-ponder dept

In response to the House's approval to extend three controversial Patriot Act spying provisions until December of this year, the Senate has (by a huge majority) voted to extend the provisions by 90 days. While any extension isn't great, a 90-day extension is better than the alternatives that were being debated. Of course, the real question is whether or not the Senate would hold any real debate or discussion about these provisions in this 90-day period. It seems unlikely, but maybe I'll be proven wrong.
18 Comments | Leave a Comment

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Jay (profile), 15 Feb 2011 @ 6:03pm

    Talking to my Senator...

    Is a huge waste of time.

    Thinking about my Congressman and telling him my opinion but really, would it ever reach him?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 15 Feb 2011 @ 6:05pm

      Re: Talking to my Senator...

      if you write a letter(you know those funny things with the stamps) then yes.

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 15 Feb 2011 @ 6:23pm

        Re: Re: Talking to my Senator...

        Actually, they even take emails seriously these days.

        [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 15 Feb 2011 @ 6:36pm

          Re: Re: Re: Talking to my Senator...

          yeah but any nut can pop off an e-mail, takes time to write a letter and send it

          [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 15 Feb 2011 @ 6:52pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Talking to my Senator...

            True, and of the two options snail mail is probably the better one. But they don't dismiss emails the way they used to.

            [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              Jay (profile), 15 Feb 2011 @ 7:01pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Talking to my Senator...

              How so? With the tons of emails they get, and the fact is bad news spreads far quicker than the good stuff, it's debatable it'll make a difference in the long run...

              [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • icon
              antimatter3009 (profile), 16 Feb 2011 @ 5:14am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Talking to my Senator...

              Right. Snail mail is probably still better, but I've gotten relatively thoughtful (read: not canned) responses to my emails before, at least from my House Rep. Senators are probably getting more mail, so you may be more likely to be lost in the shuffle.

              [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              • icon
                ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 16 Feb 2011 @ 10:53am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Talking to my Senator...

                That's a good point. More people know who their Senators are than their Reps. So especially with them you should lean towards smail (I just coined that.)

                However, as long as you indicate that you live in their district/state, most congress-critters will take an email seriously. Hell, most of them are on facebook these days.

                [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        monkyyy, 15 Feb 2011 @ 8:06pm

        Re: Re: Talking to my Senator...

        u sure? im think the last time i sent a letter it was completely ignored

        [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mudlock, 15 Feb 2011 @ 6:17pm

    Almost ten years in, and I doubt any of the Senators have even read the whole thing, let alone considered debating it.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Feb 2011 @ 6:52pm

    Why the change to 90 days?

    Was December too uncomfortably close to the 2012 elections? DO they want to get the big three year (or permanent) renewal done well before 2012?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    J.J. (profile), 15 Feb 2011 @ 7:46pm

    Sticking their finger in the wind to see the reactions before going ahead with it.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Josef Anvil (profile), 16 Feb 2011 @ 12:54am

    Seriously?

    This one is simple. No matter how ridiculous those provisions are, any attempt at changing The "Patriot" Act will result in the opposition being cast in the role of anti-Patriotic and unwilling to keep Americans "safe".

    C'mon, it was named The Patriot Act for a reason.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Thomas (profile), 16 Feb 2011 @ 5:13am

    debate them?

    hahahahaha. As #12 points out, any one opposing the act will be considered anti-patriotic. Not to mention pro-terrorist. I wonder how much of the spying they do is actually related to terrorism and how much is related to critics of the government?

    Oh god...a black SUV with tinted windows is parked in front of my house.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Shon Gale (profile), 16 Feb 2011 @ 7:20am

    Wow the US Senate did something. I'm amazed!!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    weneedhelp (profile), 16 Feb 2011 @ 7:55am

    Dont worry

    anyone who opposes it will just get anthrax sent to them in the mail.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Feb 2011 @ 4:38pm

    Oh, thank goodness the Tea Party revolution saved us!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Why Is Google Fighting So Hard To Keep Filing... >>
<< DailyDirt: Alternative Energy
 tdicon 
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories

Saturday

12:00 This Week In Techdirt History: July 16th - 22nd (1)

Friday

19:39 San Diego Comic Con Gets Gag Order On Salt Lake Comic Con (31)
15:33 MLB Mulls Over Opposing Trademark For New Overwatch League Logo (14)
13:34 Court Rejects Cell Site RF Signal Map In Murder Trial Because It's Evidence Of Nothing (16)
12:02 Politician Uses Bad Cyberharassment Law To Shut Down Critic; Critic Hoping To Have Law Struck Down (10)
10:47 Olive Garden Asks Olive Garden Reviewer Not To Refer To Olive Garden Due To Trademarks (31)
10:42 Daily Deal: Beginner Web Development Bundle (0)
09:27 Judge Dumps Stupid Libel Suit Featuring A Man Suing A Third Party For Things A Journalist Said (3)
06:24 FCC Won't Release Data To Support Its Claim A DDOS Attack, Not John Oliver, Brought Down The Agency's Website (49)
03:23 Top European Court To Consider If EU Countries Can Censor The Global Internet (29)
More arrow
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.