Perfect 10 Aiming To Lose Yet Again; Sues MegaUpload

from the setting-legal-precedents-left-and-right dept

The company Perfect 10 has a long history of filing ridiculous copyright infringement lawsuits, and losing nearly every single time. For a rather detailed look at Perfect 10's standard operating procedure, you really owe it to yourself to read the countersuit filed by Rapidshare last summer, which detailed all sorts of claims against the company -- including that its entire reason for being is to find companies to sue for copyright infringement, and that it even hopes to spread its copyright images as widely as possible, in order to have more targets to sue. The company is also famous for not actually using official takedown procedures, and filing obviously faulty takedown notices. And the thing is, Perfect 10 seems to lose in court pretty consistently. In almost every case that we're aware of, the judge ends up smacking down Perfect 10 in the end. Apparently, the company just can't get enough legal losses, as it's now suing cyberlocker site MegaUpload, and making all the usual claims. Given that the court has (so far) been siding with similar cyberlocker Rapidshare over Perfect 10, you have to wonder if this will just be yet another legal loss.

Of course, Perfect 10 has been useful in some ways. The various rulings against it in lawsuits have set useful precedents (mainly in the 9th Circuit) concerning how thumbnails and embedded files are not directly infringing. The lawsuits have also helped show that search engines shouldn't be liable for what they find. In other words, Perfect 10's lawsuits tend to be so ridiculous that they help demonstrate the ridiculous logical conclusions of arguments regularly used in other copyright infringement lawsuits. Thankfully, however, Perfect 10 has been so aggressive with its lawsuits that it has helped provide strong precedents and defenses for those sued in other cases, under circumstances that might not be quite as extreme. So while we roll our eyes at each new Perfect 10 lawsuit, it should be recognized that these lawsuits have created a decent framework for recognizing that secondary and contributory liability for copyright infringement has limits.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    drewmerc (profile), Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 4:32am

    is it just me that thinks perfect 10 is out just to set precedents and not in it for the money

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    bob, Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 4:50am

    Hummm Drewmerc Might Have It Right

    Perfect 10 is a consortium funded by the various digital locker companies to better create legal precedent framework for future use against the RIAA and MPAA and other so called rights holder groups.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 5:25am

    "its entire reason for being is to find companies to sue for copyright infringement, and that it even hopes to spread its copyright images as widely as possible, in order to have more targets to sue."

    Sounds like the WBC - one sad difference being the WBC has won in court.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 5:59am

    If I were Andrew Bridges, I would make the Big Guys an offer they cannot refuse: hire me and I will have a friend sue us so we will surely win the case and you gain legal protection.

    http://www.winston.com/index.cfm?contentID=24&itemID=13402

    Mr. Bridges ranks nationally among the foremost IP litigators, with important victories in trial and appellate courts as lead counsel in notable intellectual property cases, including:

    •the defense of MasterCard in Perfect 10 v. Visa and MasterCard, a landmark decision on secondary liability of credit card companies under copyright and trademark law, in both the trial appellate courts (arguing for all defendants)
    •the defense of Google in Perfect 10 v. Google and Perfect 10 v. Amazon.com, a landmark decision on fair use, the display and distribution rights under copyright law, and secondary liability under copyright law as applied to search engines

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    average_joe (profile), Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 6:33am

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 8:39am

    At least they are consistent. LOL.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    theangryintern (profile), Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 8:46am

    Maybe they should go back to what they used to be good at: publishing pictures of really hot naked women.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    The Infamous Joe (profile), Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 10:00am

    Heroes

    Perfect 10, making IP laws more sensible one DVDA at a time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Rachel Storms, Feb 3rd, 2011 @ 2:12pm

    content is free

    thats the new reality, adapt or die

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Qûr Tharkasdóttir, Feb 4th, 2011 @ 1:19am

    The conspirationist suggests:

    Well, maybe these Perfect 10 are sponsored by the folks at Pirate Bay. That would be quite farsighted indeed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Raichel, Feb 14th, 2011 @ 6:45am

    Free Docket

    Free docket for this case can be found right on the home page of http://FreeCourtDockets.com.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Norm Zada, Apr 1st, 2011 @ 12:47pm

    Get your facts right

    H'mmm A google AdSense affiliate. You might start off by getting one fact right. Then you can try to get a second fact right, and go from there.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This