by Mike Masnick
Thu, Jan 27th 2011 1:14am
It's been funny watching critics of Wikileaks assume that if Julian Assange was somehow takendown, or that Wikileaks itself was somehow taken offline, that this concept of intermediaries to help publish leaked documents would somehow go away. In the past few months we've seen tons of new such operations spring up, and I'm sure some will start to find success (while others will fade away). However, what may be most interesting is that the mainstream press is finally waking up to the fact that they probably should have been doing this all along. The NY Times is apparently planning to create its own version of Wikileaks in the form of an "E-Z Pass lane for leakers." This idea of systems to help people leak info isn't going away. And, I'm curious if those who think that Wikileaks is criminally liable for "inducing" leaks, also think that the NY Times is similarly liable?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- NY Times Gets It Right: Officials Calling For More Surveillance Are Proven Liars; Don't Listen To Them
- US Officials Have No Problem Leaking Classified Surveillance Information... As Long As It Fits Their Narrative
- Government-Mandated Parental Spyware Found To Be Leaking Personal Data At An Alarming Rate
- Telco Giant Vodafone Looked At Journalist's Phone Records To See Who Was Leaking Info To Her
- NY Times Falsely Claims ISIS Is Using Encryption & Couriers Because Snowden