by Mike Masnick
Thu, Jan 27th 2011 1:14am
It's been funny watching critics of Wikileaks assume that if Julian Assange was somehow takendown, or that Wikileaks itself was somehow taken offline, that this concept of intermediaries to help publish leaked documents would somehow go away. In the past few months we've seen tons of new such operations spring up, and I'm sure some will start to find success (while others will fade away). However, what may be most interesting is that the mainstream press is finally waking up to the fact that they probably should have been doing this all along. The NY Times is apparently planning to create its own version of Wikileaks in the form of an "E-Z Pass lane for leakers." This idea of systems to help people leak info isn't going away. And, I'm curious if those who think that Wikileaks is criminally liable for "inducing" leaks, also think that the NY Times is similarly liable?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Eight Years Ago, The Iowa Caucus Convinced Me Of The Power Of Twitter... Today? Not So Much
- NY Times Files Ridiculous Copyright Lawsuit Over Book That Mocks NYT For Glamorizing War
- Hateful Eight Pirated Leak Harms Film All The Way To Box Office Records
- Hateful Eight Pirated From The Inside, Widely Available, And It Won't Stop Its Success At The Box Office
- NY Times Gets It Right: Officials Calling For More Surveillance Are Proven Liars; Don't Listen To Them