HideOur Black Friday weekend sale ends tomorrow! Shop now to save on all Techdirt gear »
HideOur Black Friday weekend sale ends tomorrow! Shop now to save on all Techdirt gear »

Kyiv Post Blocking Access From The UK To Protest UK's Libel Laws

from the one-way-to-make-a-point dept

We've discussed at great length the problems with the UK's libel laws, which have put a chilling effect on free speech and public participation. The problem of libel tourism has even resulted in the US passing laws saying that it will not enforce any such judgments in the US. Glyn Moody points us to the news that the Kyiv Post has apparently decided to protest UK libel laws by blocking access to the site if you're coming from the UK. The page in question states:
The Kyiv Post, effective Dec. 14, 2010, is blocking access to all web traffic originating from the United Kingdom in protest of the draconian libel laws there that hinder legitimate free speech and threaten the work of independent journalists, authors, scientists and others worldwide. In a phenomenon known as "libel tourism," rich and powerful plaintiffs file lawsuits in London -- "the libel capital of the world" -- to exploit laws stacked in their favor, stifling journalism and threatening news organizations and others with costly lawsuits.
Nice to see a media publication take a stand like that, even if it's mostly symbolic. Hopefully it will help spur the UK to finally reform its libel laws.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: kyiv post, libel, protests, uk


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Mr. Oizo, 26 Jan 2011 @ 11:11pm

    Of course

    I wonder for what they were sued :-)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Chargone (profile), 27 Jan 2011 @ 2:25am

      Re: Of course

      you know, that whole 'don't end sentences with prepositions' thing?

      not actually applicable to English, for two reasons: one: English actually does that, properly, all the time, and always (to the best of my knowledge. certainly for the last century or two, even in formal contexts) has. it was Latin that did not.

      second, technically speaking, when you do, they stop being prepositions Anyway and are in fact post positions.

      i think you meant to say 'i wonder what they were sued for', or, if you Really want to avoid that post position 'i wonder why they were sued'... though the second one does heavily imply that their being sued is a known fact and happened in the past, rather than conjecture.
      this has been your random grammar Nazi fyi of the day :P

      (also, yes, i am aware of my incredibly dubious use of punctuation marks and capitals, or lack there of)

      on the subject of the actual topic:
      yay for smart moves in the face of stupidity... now let's see if it actually has a positive outcome.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jason, 27 Jan 2011 @ 2:46pm

      I can't hear you..

      "I can't hear you. I've got a banana in my ear!!"

      "Why don't you take out the banana if you can't hear?"

      "Are you saying I'm deaf? That's not true!! I CAN hear, I've just got a banana in my ear! Slander! Libel!!

      "Oh, nevermind."

      "What's that? I can't hear you; I've got..."

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ben (profile), 27 Jan 2011 @ 2:11am

    Kyiv Post?

    Never heard of them 'til this, so the fact they're blocking me is immaterial. Streisand marketing?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Simon Chamberlain, 27 Jan 2011 @ 4:59am

      Re: Kyiv Post?

      Likewise never heard of them. Their articles are in Nexis, but not since about December 2002, so I'm guessing that they aren't really a particularly important paper. Certainly not in the UK.

      (This looks a bit quixotic anyway: preventing me from accessing their website does zilch to change the laws here, all it does is lose them readers).

      As for lawsuits: I found an article from March 2008 which says "Ukrainian tycoon Rinat Akhmetov on Monday accepted a public apology and undisclosed damages [from the Kyiv Post] over false allegations that he stole billions of dollars by rigging share auction processes, according to AFP.". The article says an English law firm acted for Akhmetov. So I think that answers Mr. Oizo's question in post #1

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jason, 27 Jan 2011 @ 2:51pm

      Re: Kyiv Post?

      I think the point is that rather than bow to ridiculous UK restrictions on speech, they'll keep saying whatever they like while eliminating possibility for libel in the UK.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Not an electronic Rodent, 27 Jan 2011 @ 3:24am

    Double standards

    US passing laws saying that it will not enforce any such judgments in the US.
    I love it when the US government gets like this:
    "You must enforce all our pointless and draconian laws because we say so and besides we think they are to our benefit, but we'll block any of yours we don't like because we are A-merican and international partnership means you do what we say.... besides we're right every time."

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Palmyra (profile), 27 Jan 2011 @ 6:30am

      Re: Double standards

      Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Johnny, 27 Jan 2011 @ 6:58am

      Re: Double standards

      Except the EU did the same to block the US anti-Cuba law. i.e. any american company who sues a european company for activities in Cuba can be sued in the EU for damages and their executives banned from traveling to the EU.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helms%E2%80%93Burton_Act
      The European Union introduced a Council Regulation (No 2271/96)[4] (law binding all member states) declaring the extraterritorial provisions of the Helms–Burton Act to be unenforceable within the EU, and permitting recovery of any damages imposed under it. The EU law also applied sanctions against US companies and their executives for making Title III complaints.


      Mind you I think that was a good thing, we should counter the extra-territorial effects of US laws more often. And the US is fully right to do the same with European and British laws that have effect in the US. Like this crazy UK libel law.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    beasty111, 10 Feb 2011 @ 5:22am

    Kiev post blocking UK Readers,,,hahahahaha

    I read it (Kiev Post) every day,over the net here in the UK.
    Think they should realise that if they don`t want people to read it ,,don`t post it on the internet,,there are alway`s ways round censorship of this sort.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    beasty111, 10 Feb 2011 @ 5:22am

    Kiev post blocking UK Readers,,,hahahahaha

    I read it (Kiev Post) every day,over the net here in the UK.
    Think they should realise that if they don`t want people to read it ,,don`t post it on the internet,,there are alway`s ways round censorship of this sort.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.