Rep. Peter King Wants Treasury Dept. To Put Wikileaks On Terrorist List
from the overreact-much? dept
Apparently Rep. Peter King is in a competition with Senator Joe Lieberman to see who can overreact more to Wikileaks. It seems like a neck-and-neck competition, with Peter King's brand of craziness potentially taking the lead. King, of course, was the guy who insisted that Wikileaks should be declared a terrorist organization and claimed (with nothing whatsoever to back this up) that the cable leak was worse than a military attack. His latest move is to ask Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to add Wikileaks to the Treasury Department's "Specially Designated National and Blocked Persons List," which is usually used to designate terrorist and organized crime operations.
So while Lieberman merely used political pressure to get companies to block or censor Wikileaks, King wants it to become official government policy that no US companies or individuals should be doing anything with Wikileaks. Overreact much?
So while Lieberman merely used political pressure to get companies to block or censor Wikileaks, King wants it to become official government policy that no US companies or individuals should be doing anything with Wikileaks. Overreact much?
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The same that every US city thinks of Detroit?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yeah Detroit's image sucks....but on the plus side - we do have the Red Wings.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Ahem, I'm a Blackhawks fan. Their Red Wings do not impress me....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'm sorry I didn't hear that. Hold on, let me take this Stanley Cup out of my ear....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Lol. Props on that one.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We think the reaction to the leaks is more harmful than the content of the leaks.
The leaks themselves just confirmed what everyone already knew about the states.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Peter King's point of view
"Administration officials said they were not aware of anyone who has been attacked or imprisoned as a direct result of information in the 2,700 cables that have been made public to date by WikiLeaks, The New York Times and several other publications, many with some names removed. But they caution that many dissidents are under constant harassment from their governments, so it is difficult to be certain of the cause of actions against them."
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That should tell you all you need to know.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
An article about this is at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/11/peter-king-strict-gun-control_n_807323.html
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No, it's not illegal when the cops shoot people.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes it is. They have the same defenses to it as we do - self defense, defense of others, etc., but if they walked up and shot someone, they would go to jail just as if you did it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You are not describing reality.
Read the news much? Recently, in Long Beach, CA police walked up to a man sitting on a porch and shot him without warning. In Seattle, WA, police walked up to a deaf guy, and shot him four seconds later for not listening. These are not isolated instances.
It's not illegal when the cops shoot people. That's the real law: The law that gets enforced.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Depends on who you are.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The guy with all the sociopath murderous buddies speaks again. Birds of a feather really do flock together.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's funny, one anonymous poster calling another one out for being anonymous. Pot, meet kettle.
Still, no denying it though, huh? Thank goodness for anonymous posters, otherwise I imagine you and your buddies would like to track a few of them down and put bullets in their heads. Gee, now wouldn't that be "cute"?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Weird thing, when i tried to find Darryl here on techdirt it shows nothing. The last time I saw him post was on Thursday or Friday of last week. Kinda makes me wonder .... hmmmm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Use a rest if needed. Control your breathing. Squeeze on the exhale. Practice!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Really? It certainly doesn't look like that to me. Maybe you're just projecting your own jealously onto it.
Use a rest if needed. Control your breathing. Squeeze on the exhale. Practice!
Yet another one. Sigh.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I take it you are a vegetarian? That would explain the weak whine.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
/sarcasm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
There's 4 R's in your title word Terrorist.
:)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's just a sign of how terrrible this is. :)
Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Ah, that explains why Tony always told me how grrrreat Frosted Flakes are....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Usually, it's the States that dumb things down, but I thought "Frosted Flakes?" and checked. While Tony was still the mascot over here in Europe, that cereal was just called Frosties, but it is the same cereal!
You learn something new every day, etc...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Sleep with dogs, you get fleas. Sleep with Assange, you might want to get checked by a doctor.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Where can we be checked for the corruption we implicitly support? And is there treatment for that soil upon our souls?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I feel much more terrorized by certain gov't officials, agencies and politicians (such as Peter King) than just about anyone else. I we start by putting THEM on the TERRORIST list.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
ggaaawddd
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ggaaawddd
Not any more. The US is now a corpocracy.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ggaaawddd
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
He's a terrorist...
It's a far cry from our founding fathers, who wanted to make sure states and local militias would exist to overthrow the federal government if they overreached the authority granted by the Constitution.
Sadly, I think our founders would reech if they saw what their United States had become.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe the Watch list NEEDS this
Never could figure out how a list of names was remotely useful in a world where fake IDs are so readily available, and any terrorist worth being scared of probably has a stock pile of them sitting in his closet.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Like Lieberman before him, I've got to ask: Just what are these particular politicos so rabid over everyone potentially finding out about? Did they bring some of those "tribal dance" kids home for a private showing or something?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
This has me curious too. Probably a lot of others also. And I normally wouldn't care, because politicians are, well, politicians.
It's akin to the Streisand Effect, but not quite the same. We might need a new name for this type of thing.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course they see Wikileaks as a "terrorist" organization,...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Get Real
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment