DailyDirt: Modern Swords To Plowshares
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
As technology advances, it's increasingly obvious that almost any piece of hardware can be used as a weapon, if put in the wrong hands. We can't exactly ban people from brewing their own beer at home because it's possible that they could also incubate a bioweapon with the same equipment. But how about re-purposing weapons for peaceful missions? NASA has inherited a couple pretty nice spy telescopes, and there could be plenty of other scientific uses for certain military hardware.- A Chinese guided rocket named the SY-400 (aka the Heavy Sword) was fired into a typhoon -- for science. This shot didn't deliver an explosive payload, but a scientific one filled with sensors to collect atmospheric data. [url]
- The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) gets the same very bad suggestion a LOT, so it has publicly posted its official answer. The tl;dr version -- it is a VERY bad idea to try to stop a hurricane with a nuclear bomb. The slightly longer answer: the amount of energy needed to stop a hurricane is far greater than any weapon at our disposal; plus, the nuclear fallout would be insanely bad for everyone and everything. [url]
- NASA uses Global Hawk unmanned aircraft to study various atmospheric phenomena. Drones can fly day and night to study hurricanes, and NASA operates a variety of aircraft equipped for scientific missions. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drones, global hawk, hurricanes, military hardware, missiles, nuclear bomb, rocket, sy-400, typhoon, weapons, weather
Companies: nasa, noaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
As a bonus it gets rid of those pesky nuclear stockpiles! No need to store spent uranium/plutonium either!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Ummmmmm...no.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Ummmmmm...no.
I'd rather the fallout stowed nicely in a hole in a rock than scattered all over the Atlantic, thanks.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Nice try but not really
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nice try but not really
Be more specific about what you're replying to. ;)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
“Weaponry” Without The Weapons
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I thought it was odd seeing the nuclear bomb question.
We did consider nuclear depth charges since water is marvelous as absorbing the radiation from a nuke, but even then our conventional anti-sub weapons are adequate enough without causing an international nuclear incident.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I thought it was odd seeing the nuclear bomb question.
Didn't the US once do a high altitude detonation over New England, to try and seed rain, which actually succeeded in producing these huge rain clouds, with the unfortunate side-effect of being radioactive?
Then that pesky Nuclear Test Ban Treaty came along and ruined everything.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Using explosives to disperse tornadoes
Despite tornadoes being sudden and unpredictable systems, there's also the matter that explosives would be adding a lot of heat to a system that is fueled by heat, so the blast may disrupt a part of system for the moment (the eye, for a well-guided shot) but the newly heated and destabilized air would only ensure that the storm would resume and be stronger for the blast.
Even a MOAB (the largest American conventional weapon) would be a momentary hole in a tornado / super-cell system. Our puny human weapons only make the beast stronger.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply