by Mike Masnick
Tue, Dec 28th 2010 7:47am
Back in September, we noted our skepticism of some police and press reports about burglars using Facebook to pick their targets. It makes for a good story, but it just seems like an incredibly inefficient way to go about things -- and even with certain Facebook status updates, you have no idea if that means everyone in the house is gone. It just seems a hell of a lot easier to use other methods. Yet, because it's online and police and the press love to jump to conclusions, we've now got another similar report -- this time by the BBC, involving police in the UK warning people that Facebook updates are a burglary risk. The evidence for this? A woman whose house was robbed thinks it's because her kids posted a Facebook update about how they were going to be out getting a dog that day. Actual evidence to support that? None. Did they catch the burglar and find out it was a Facebook friend? Nope. Did they even review the Facebook friends? Doesn't sound like it. So why does everyone jump to these conclusions?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Court Says Deleting Browser History To 'Avoid Embarrassment' Isn't Destruction Of Evidence
- Oracle's 'Gamechanger' Evidence Really Just Evidence Of Oracle Lawyers Failing To Read
- DOJ Tells Forensic Experts To Stop Overstating The 'Scientific Certainty' Of Presented Evidence
- Another Judge Declares FBI's Playpen Warrant Invalid, Suppresses All Evidence
- The NYPD's Third 'Forfeiture' Option: Call Seized Items 'Evidence;' Never Give Them Back