DailyDirt: Remember When 'Wireless' Just Meant Radio?

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

The internets are flooded with iPhone on Verizon commentary — and the buzz probably won’t die down until people actually start using the phones. Until then, we’ll be ignoring all the debates over whether or not it’s a fatal flaw that CDMA won’t let you talk and surf at the same time. As Louis CK says, “Everything is amazing and nobody is happy.” Anyway, here are some quick wireless articles that remind us that these radio-powered gadgets always have room for improvement.

  • Got antenna problems? Perhaps solid-state plasma antennas will be the answer. This kind of antenna definitely won’t be exposed on phones — and it’s a bit ominous that this technology is also being developed for “pain beams” by the military. [url]
  • Verizon’s modem hand-offs from 3G to LTE can take two minutes. Clearly, the solution to this problem is to just upgrade everything to LTE. [url]
  • T-Mobile is trying to get 4G speeds with 3G equipment. Hopefully, the alphabet soup of wireless acronyms will be completely obsolete in a few years. [url]
  • To actually make reliable calls, perhaps we just need wires still — and have femtocells to let people go cordless. The femtocell workaround seems like a strange kludge… you really have to love your cellphone to set up a dedicated 5-bar area for it. [url]
  • Filed Under: , , ,
    Companies: t-mobile, verizon

    Rate this comment as insightful
    Rate this comment as funny
    You have rated this comment as insightful
    You have rated this comment as funny
    Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
    You have flagged this comment
    The first word has already been claimed
    The last word has already been claimed
    Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

    Comments on “DailyDirt: Remember When 'Wireless' Just Meant Radio?”

    Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
    12 Comments
    Anonymous Coward says:

    Nevelle Ray is the Best!

    I have a private blog post that I authored in November titled “Why I Won’t Ever Play Poker with Nevelle Ray”

    It’s really neat.

    Hey look at that- Nevelle Ray is now 4G Americas Chairperson.

    Don’t take my word for it, check it out here:
    http://americas.rcrwireless.com/2011/01/05/t-mobile-usa?s-neville-ray-to-serve-as-4g-americas?-chairperson/

    Anonymous Coward says:

    Cordless phones already have base stations that hook into a landline. I’m guessing femtocells would do the same thing but for your cell phone, allowing you to take it with you and then have the reliability of landlines when you’re in your own home. Seems like a good idea since it’ll reduce the number of phones people have. Personally, I get really bad cell phone reception inside my own apartment and I don’t have a balcony which means I have to go all the way downstairs and outside in order to make a cell phone call. A femtocell would mean I don’t have to keep and pay for a separate landline just for calling inside. Yeah it might be laziness but convenience is a good thing.

    Anonymous Coward says:

    “But the new antenna, called Plasma Silicon Antenna, or PSiAN, relies on existing low-cost manufacturing techniques developed for silicon chips. It has been developed by Plasma Antennas of Winchester, UK.”

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20827904.600-wireless-at-the-speed-of-plasma.html

    I’m actually surprised that this kind of innovation is coming from the U.K. Shows they at least still have some innovative potential. Of course it’s not coming out of the U.S. , we’re never at cutting edge of technology anymore. Now most of our innovation consists of patents on ideas that were copied from other countries. I was reading about the latest camera pill the other day and guess who developed it? Japan. The only thing the U.S. is at the cutting edge of these days is IP litigation.

    The U.S. used to be innovative at one time. but now we’re just litigious.

    Arnon says:

    Femtocells are not a kludge

    They are a scam.
    Let’s see how it works.
    1. Wireless provider does not build enough infrastructure (i.e. whole towns in the middle of silicone valley with crappy reception due to lack of towers)
    2. Very same provider gets you to shell out $100 to get the reception they were supposed to provide in the first place
    3. By doing so you end up extending their coverage for a few houses around you on your penny
    4. Said provider does not have to carry your traffic as you end up carrying it on your internet connection (oops, you just paid again)

    Add Your Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

    Comment Options:

    Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

    What's this?

    Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

    Follow Techdirt

    Techdirt Daily Newsletter

    Ctrl-Alt-Speech

    A weekly news podcast from
    Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

    Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
    Techdirt Deals
    Techdirt Insider Discord
    The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
    Loading...