Culture

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
cheating, ethics, students, tests



200 Students Admit To 'Cheating' On Exam... But Bigger Question Is If It Was Really Cheating Or Studying

from the wait-a-second... dept

A friend passed on this Telegraph story about how 200 students in a Strategic Management class at the University of Central Florida came forward to admit to "cheating" on the midterm exam after the professor in the class, Richard Quinn, gave a lecture where he noted the evidence that about 1/3 of the 600 student class had "cheated" on the exam. He then gave them an option: saying that, if they admitted to cheating within a week,re they would be able to complete the class and the incident would not go on their record and they would not face discipline (they also had to take an ethics class). If they did not, and they were still caught, then they could face expulsion for violating academic integrity policies. You can watch the video of the lecture here:
Not surprisingly, the story of 200 students "turning themselves over" made all sorts of headlines. It's a good story of "cheaters" being pressured into 'fessing up... right? It's leading to typical hand-wringing stories about what should we do about cheating in schools. But, as I watched the video, the whole thing started to feel just a little bit off... My main interest was to learn two things: (1) what the students did to cheat and (2) how the professor was identifying who cheated. Both points seemed like pertinent details.

The answer to that first one surprised me. The "cheating" was that students got their hands on the textbook publisher's "testbank" of questions. Many publishers have a testbank that professors can use as sample test questions. But watching Quinn's video, it became clear that in accusing his students of "cheating" he was really admitting that he wasn't actually writing his own tests, but merely pulling questions from a testbank. That struck me as odd -- and I wasn't really sure that what the students did should count as cheating. Taking "sample tests" is a very good way to learn material, and going through a testbank is a good way to practice "sample" questions. It seemed like the bigger issue wasn't what the students did... but what the professor did.

In looking around, it looks like a lot of the students agree. They're saying that the real issue is that Prof. Quinn simply copied questions from the publisher, rather than actually recreating his own test, and noting that this seems like a massive double standard. The professor is allowed to just copy questions from others for his tests? In fact, some of the students have put together a video pointing out that, at the beginning of the year, Prof. Quinn claimed that he had written the test questions himself. As the article notes:
Can the UCF students be blamed for using all the available tools to study for the test? How were the students to know that Quinn would take his questions from the test bank, when he explicitly said that professors do not do so any more? Moreover, why did Quinn tell his students that he is the one who creates the mid-term and final exams, when in fact it wasn’t so?
The students have put together a video pointing out where he said (in the first lecture) that he writes the questions himself:
The local student news operation sent a reporter to speak to Quinn and ask him about the double standard and his copying of questions, and Quinn totally ignored him:
Now, there's a pretty good chance that some of the students probably knew that Quinn was a lazy professor, who just used testbank questions, rather than writing his own. That's the kind of information that tends to get around. But it's still not clear that using testbank questions to study is really an ethical lapse. Taking sample tests is a good way to practice for an exam and to learn the subject matter. And while those 200 students "confessed," it seems like they did so mainly to avoid getting kicked out of school -- not because they really feel they did anything wrong -- and I might have to agree with them.

We've seen plenty of stories over the years about professors trying to keep up with modern technology -- and I recognize that it's difficult to keep creating new exams for classes. But in this case, it looks like Prof. Quinn barely created anything at all. He just pulled questions from a source that the students had access to as well and copied them verbatim. It would seem that, even if you think the students did wrong here, the Professor was equally negligent. Will he have to sit through an ethics class too?

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    darryl, 19 Nov 2010 @ 9:47am

    "even if you think the students did wrong here, the Professor was equally negligent" Really Mike, in 'mikeworld' that might be the case..

    Its quite simple Mike, You ARE cheating if you look up the answers, you are not cheating if you are looking up the questions.

    This is not an exam to test the teacher, it was an exam to test the students.

    It does not matter where the teacher got the questions from, or if he made them up or got them from a testbank. that is what teachers do..

    What students are SUPPOSED to do, is be honest, and not look up question banks, or try to find out what the questions are before the exam.

    They should be trying to find out what the answers are (by studying) and not what the questions are (by cheating).

    And after all, if the students did not believe they were cheating, and KNOW they were cheating, they would not have fessed up to cheating.

    I think they all should be expelled for cheating, or have it permanently placed on their facebook page, for all to see that they are willing to cheat in exams, to give themselves an edge over HONEST people.

    Again, cheating only gets you so far, if you are stupid enough to cheat, you WILL be caught, sooner or later it will be found out that you dont know shit. Cheating might get you to the job interview, but you will fail the interview when its found out you are living a lie..

    So Mike, go ahead, make out that cheating is ok, as long as you can put some of the blame onto the teacher (after all he should not be teaching things that are so hard right)..

    But its not the students cheating, that has you worried Mike, its the professor calling them out and catching them for cheating..

    You just have to defend the rule breakers again Mike..

    To say the professor was equally negligent is a joke Mike, he is not negligent at all.. he is doing his job.

    I hope you get to hire some people sometimes in your life, Mike and if you do I hope you get one of those that cheated and does not know anything,, perfect match for you.. so the ignorant can lead the blind...

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.