by Mike Masnick
Fri, Nov 12th 2010 4:33pm
Lots of talk today about the fact that Newsweek, the struggling magazine that's been around for 77 years, has merged with two-year old website The Daily Beast, which never really picked up all that much traffic considering its ambitions. But in an odd move, reports now are saying that the plan is to shut down the Newsweek site and to keep The Daily Beast running. If that's the case... um... why merge at all? Newsweek has the more well known brand and much more traffic. This sounds like an ego merger, where the idea is just to promote the fact that The Daily Beast devoured Newsweek. And that gets you, what, the attention of a tiny group of media business insiders for a couple weeks?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Netflix Says Striking Cap-Exempt Deals With Australian ISPs Was A Mistake It Won't Make Again
- DailyDirt: Problems With Peer Reviewed Publications
- 70% Of Fans Still Can't Watch LA Dodgers Games On TV Thanks To Time Warner Cable
- Dorian Nakamoto Wants To Sue Newsweek -- But It Seems Unlikely To Succeed And Could Cause More Problems For Him
- Bias In Tech & Media: Lists That Perpetuate The Stereotypes