Turns Out The Evil Halloween Candy Poisoners Was Just FUD That Got You To Buy Prepackaged Candy

from the check-the-wrappers dept

When I moved into my current home a few years back, I discovered (a few weeks later) on Halloween that one of my neighbors is a professional choclatier, when a pair of insanely delicious home-made caramel candy apples were delivered to my house as a "reverse trick-or-treat." It was definitely a nice "welcome to the neighborhood" moment. However, even though I knew I could trust these apples, it immediately brought me back to when I was a kid, when there were all these big scary news stories about people poisoning candy and putting razors in caramel candy apples for neighborhood trick-or-treaters. I remember my parents followed the evening news' recommendations of immediately taking the bags of candy we came home with and to spread them out on the kitchen table to go through them looking for exposed candy or loose wrappers to dump in the garbage. It was serious business. These days, many places are so worried about the scary poisoning/razor-blading neighbors that they've officially tried to move trick-or-treating to local businesses away from residences.

I'd never really thought much about the scare stories and whether or not they true. When I was a kid, I assumed of course they were true. It was being reported on the news, and I think my school sent home paper warnings as well. How could it not be true? However, Samira Kawash, who is apparently an expert in "candy," is writing a series of posts about Halloween, and one of them notes that the whole story of poisoned/razor-bladed Halloween candy from sadistic neighbors is almost entirely a myth. The number of children really harmed by such things? "Approximately zero."
It turns out that the Halloween sadist is about 1 percent fact and 99 percent myth. One California dentist in 1959 did pass out candy-coated laxatives, and some kids got bad stomachaches. But instances over the past 40 years where children were allegedly harmed by tainted candy have invariably fallen apart under scrutiny. In some cases, there was evidence that someone (a family member) was attempting to harm a particular child under cover of Halloween. In other cases, poisoning which had another cause was misattributed to candy. Not surprisingly, the myth created its own reality: As the stories of Halloween tampering spread, some kids got the idea of faking tampering as a sort of prank. Despite all evidence to the contrary, the myth persists.
Of course, in retrospect, this makes sense. We see stories all the time these days of the press (and sometimes groups of parents) creating a moral panic around some dubious piece of information about "harm to children" that never seems to stand up to any serious scrutiny. But, as Kawash notes, "the myth persists." And, while they may not be the reason the myth started or persisted, the main beneficiaries of the myth were the big candy companies, who actually have been linked to health problems at industrial food processing plants:
Wrappers are like candy condoms: Safe candy is candy that is covered and sealed. And not just any wrapper will do. Loose, casual, cheap wrappers, the kind of wrappers one might find on locally produced candies or non-brand-name candies, are also liable to send candy to Halloween purgatory. The close, tight factory wrapper says "sealed for your protection." And the recognized brand name on the wrapper also lends a reassuring aura of corporate responsibility and accountability. It's a basic axiom of consumer faith: The bigger the brand, the safer the candy.

Ironic, since we know that the most serious food dangers are those that originate from just the kind of large-scale industrial food processing environments that also bring us name-brand, mass-market candies. Salmonella, E. coli, and their bacterial buddies lurking in bagged salads and pre-formed hamburger patties are real food dangers; home-made cookies laced with ground glass are not.
Kawash notes that all of this has come at the cost of good, home-made treats, which actually may have been safer for kids. So, as we hit Halloween weekend, I'm sure you'll have plenty of opportunities for eating processed candy options, but perhaps it's time to put an end to the old myth.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    DMNTD, Oct 29th, 2010 @ 7:55pm

    I'll do it...

    Told you mom and dad. HAHA, no one wins in the game of paranoia.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 29th, 2010 @ 8:21pm

    How about eating less candy or none...just a thought.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The Mighty Buzzard (profile), Oct 29th, 2010 @ 11:27pm

      Re:

      Pffft, the only way you'll take my Halloween candy away is via stomach contents inspection during autopsy. And yes, I will rise as a zombie long enough to finish it off if I die before I've eaten it all. It's that important.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 29th, 2010 @ 8:52pm

    Bogus PSA

    When you look at the facts it is clear that tampering with candy just doesn't happen. These PSA warning in the US are the equivalent of warning about Bigfoot if you go camping.

    I have always felt this is just another way to keep the populace scared. People will poison your children! Keeps everyone on edge and not trusting each other which is exactly the opposite that the actual reality of Halloween teaches us.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 12:20am

      Re: Bogus PSA

      I never looked at it that way before--that halloween teaches us that we can trust each other.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Christopher (profile), Oct 30th, 2010 @ 12:46am

      Re: Bogus PSA

      True. Even homemade candy is VERY safe and also, many times has less chemical additives in it than the pre-packaged stuff.

      This needs to be sent out LOUD AND CLEAR by the mainstream media, to make people realize that there are VERY FEW people sick & twisted enough to want to poison children on Halloween.... and most of them are the kid's own parents!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 29th, 2010 @ 9:00pm

    To the extent that the MSM doesn't purposely spread lies anymore, it's only because the Internet doesn't allow it to. The MSM would lie to us about everything w/o the scrutiny of the Internet, and the MSM used to lie about everything just 10 years ago even. It was really bad 20 years ago. Comparing the news now to how it was 15 years ago there is a world of difference, the MSM doesn't spread such obvious lies as much anymore.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Urza9814, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 2:42pm

      Re:

      The only reason the MSM doesn't spread lies anymore is because they've moved on to just not saying anything of value at all. I mean, all they do is report on [latest crazy celebrity]. Has nothing to do with the internet.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Oct 29th, 2010 @ 9:12pm

    Scopes has had an article about this myth for years now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 4:07am

    Oh Nuts!

    Nuts is the current one for "bought stuff good home made stuff BAD". Try taking a home made cake into a school (in England at least) and see the reaction "Oh I'm sorry, we can't be sure what's in it... some children are allergic to nuts and we need a list of ingredients"
    Ironic really when almost every bought cake in the universe will say at the very least "This product was made in a facvtory that uses nuts and may contain trace nuts" because of hte paranioa of being sued. I know nut allergies aren't funny... but the hype is kinda.
    My fave found on a packet of peanuts: "WARNING: This product may contain nuts". I'd damn well hope so!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      peterchen, Nov 1st, 2010 @ 12:27am

      Re: Oh Nuts!

      That's because peanuts aren't nuts, but legumes. So your nut allergy might be over! 9000!!! but you still can eat peanuts safely. Unless they contain traces of nuts.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Wolfy, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 4:30am

    @#4:

    There was a time when the "mainstream media" was a true watchdog over government. When the crooks in power in government (mostly republicans) got fed up with all the attention they were getting from said media, they complained of a "left wing bias" in the reporting. They then got with their banker pals and set up their own network to give their own "perspective" on their version of "news". That new network is called fox.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      harbingerofdoom (profile), Oct 30th, 2010 @ 11:28am

      Re:

      way to toe the partisan line there.

      there was a time when mainstream media actually reported on important stuff and some pop star shaving her head would never have made it into the news.

      perhaps we should all back away from the partisan finger pointing and actually start holding people accountable instead?

      yeah, i know.... im just a wacko bent on the destruction of everything nice....

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 10:46pm

        Re: Re:

        No, by saying that the leftist part of the media is biased, you're an evil right wing neo-con who eats puppies.

        I pride myself on being an extreme moderate. I hate the left and the right so much that I don't even want to be in the center between the two.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Wolfy, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 4:32am

    BOO!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Josef Anvil (profile), Oct 30th, 2010 @ 6:28am

    Ok, this blows

    Why do I now feel like a huge portion of my childhood has been tampered with for no good reason. I remember hearing those stories and thinking they were quite true.

    This actually is another feather in the cap for TechDirt. It just reinforces all the stories about "real" journalists vs alternative media. If only those "real" journallists had access to Snopes.com back then, we could have enjoyed a better class of treats on All Hallows Eve.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Lummy, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 6:42am

    Adult candy procurement

    Using the "Kids we need to check your candy" line is how my wife and I got candy on holloween for the last 16 years!
    Fear = Candy

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 9:52am

      Re: Adult candy procurement

      The scare tactics always worked on me as a kid. My mom would eat the great candied apples the old lady up the street would hand out every year. I was sure they were full of razors. I wanted the stuff from the candy store anyway, kids always seem to want what is advertised vs. what is good.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      PandaMarketer (profile), Oct 30th, 2010 @ 2:27pm

      Re: Adult candy procurement

      Keep Fear Alive!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Beta (profile), Oct 30th, 2010 @ 8:30am

    I knew I'd use this some day.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Thamios, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 5:09pm

    I've gotta call BS on this, actually. I can remember multiple news reports of arrests because people slipped razor blades/pins/thumbtacks/whatever into candy during halloween when i was a kid. Anyone who says it doesn't happen is full of it.

    The best part, though, it usually happened with brand name candy, not local brands. Have you ever tried to open one end of a candy wrapper and put it back together? Yeah. It's easy with a little bit of patience, and you can't tell the difference usually.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 30th, 2010 @ 6:22pm

      Re:

      So...in an article about over-hyped warnings that aren't fact-checked by the media reporting on the issues...your counter-evidence is said over-hyped warnings?

      That's just brilliant.

      "People on the internet are unreliable."
      "That's bullshit! People on the internet tell me they're reliable all the time!"

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 31st, 2010 @ 3:40pm

      Re:

      [Citation Needed]

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      TtfnJohn (profile), Nov 1st, 2010 @ 11:56am

      Re:

      I remember (barely) all the reports and reports of arrests usually in land far far away like Vancouver. (I was born on Vancouver Island)

      What I don't remember is any convictions.

      For some reason, probably snarkiness at my instructor of 20th Century History, I decided to do a quick paper on this and dove headlong into the Law library at UBC. Guess what I found?

      Almost all those arrests in Canada and the United States were on "suspicion" of adulterating the treats and I the only charges I found were against nuclear family members or one step away and even then just a slight scattering of convictions.

      (Remember, in the 40s, 50s and 60s no one talked about this because the "Leave It To Beaver" household was worshiped and none of these things ever really happened unless the parent, sibling, aunt, uncle or grandparent was a serious nutbar. Perhaps not even then.)

      I got a big fat F on that paper and when I appealed it the instructor hadn't checked my bibliography, footnotes and citations she just didn't believe me cause it HAD to be true. I got a 75% later cause of my horrendous spelling when I typed it up at 3:30am.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    james (profile), Oct 30th, 2010 @ 9:59pm

    oh our so called 4th estate alarming us over nothing, after al the weather warnings, who;s surprised.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    tracker1 (profile), Oct 31st, 2010 @ 12:56am

    It does happen.. rarely though...

    My dad was a police officer while I was growing up, mostly undercover... My mom was a police dispatcher... There was a single year I wasn't allowed to go trick-or-treating when I was about 8... it's because the police had caught someone poisoning a candy shipment... though this says nothing to the home or local made candy... just an interesting tidbit that there are insane people out there... just the same I'd rather not have to resort to pliers to get into my bottle of milk.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Andrew (profile), Nov 1st, 2010 @ 1:51pm

      Re: It does happen.. rarely though...

      A candy shipment. Poisoning a candy shipment. I don't know, somehow I suspect that if someone had been caught attempting to injure or kill hundreds of people (assuming a "shipment" is more than a sack of wrapped candy) that it might have made wider news than at the police station water fountain. So, was it in the paper, do you know? Where as this?

      Another anecdote without any actual evidence. I don't doubt that you may have been told that, but that is the very definition of anecdotal, like 99.99% of all these stories.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    NullOp, Oct 31st, 2010 @ 6:58am

    Candy

    I grew up when Halloween was a "religious experience" waited for all year. The neighborhoods were literally awash in kids! Groups of 25 or more were not uncommon. They crossed the streets like Fall leaves blown by strong winds. The worst thing I ever ran into personally was a man that had heated pennies in the over then offered them to the kids on a tray. Big funny! I suspect he got more tricks than he expected. The story of adults harming kids came later. It brought a good amount of anxiety to parents and eventually led, in part, to today's Halloween Anxiety Syndrome or HAS. I am glad to know that, at least in some places, Halloween is still a very big deal and a great deal of fun for the kids. However, with today's manipulative methods used by all companies Halloween has joined the ranks of engineered holidays much like Christmas.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Norman Rogers, Oct 31st, 2010 @ 2:43pm

    PCP

    Doesn't this count?

    http://www.snopes.com/horrors/drugs/suckers.asp

    While the article says that there is no connection to Halloween, there is a good bit of information there to suggest that being vigilant is always a good idea.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      crade (profile), Nov 1st, 2010 @ 9:24am

      Re: PCP

      Um, no that doesn't count. That is just some druggies who decided they want to try their drugs in sucker form instead of pill form. Nothing new there. I bet you marihuana has been found in *gasp* brownies! everyone avoid buying brownies.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    tax cpe, Oct 31st, 2010 @ 6:41pm

    Good way..

    .. of scaring your kids from eating those unhealthy candies... though it somehow kills the spirit of Trick or Treat. Imagine kids looking at you with doubt in their eyes when you hand them your homemade or store-bought candies...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    dave, Nov 1st, 2010 @ 9:11am

    is the low rate of injury actually, verifiably due to the fact that there are very few tamper incidents, or is it due to the fact that the public has taken to shunning non-store bought candy?

    we all know that "correlation does not equal causation" so i'm just bringing this up because there's no real proof offered either way and this seems like it's being presented as "told-you-so" fact.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      crade (profile), Nov 1st, 2010 @ 9:26am

      Re:

      Wouldn't have had to have been some sort of rate of injury before the public found out and shunned non-store bought candy for your theory to work?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        dave, Nov 2nd, 2010 @ 9:37am

        Re: Re:

        ya, some sort of rate could be possible. could be a case of even once is too much, but nothing we see here justifies that call either way.

        it's not beyond belief that the evil corporations could pull strings to get the news to blow up a single incident or two way out of proportion. that would cause the people to stop eating non-major-manufacturer candy, so from then on there'd be no way to compare the rate of tampering would be greater or less with home made vs store bought.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Desco (profile), Nov 1st, 2010 @ 9:35am

    Popcorn

    We handed out fresh popcorn out of a popcorn machine this weekend. Granted, we run a home haunt, so people KNOW where they got it from, but it was interesting to see the reaction as people were handed fresh food. (The haunt was themed after classic horror movies, so the popcorn--especially the smell of it--was very appropriate.) At first, the old FUD came welling to the surface with looks of shock, horror, disgust, and sometimes a polite "no thanks", but then they thought for a second and took it anyway. Want to reverse this? If you want to distribute something homemade, include your name and address. Maybe email. People will feel a lot better if they can trace the source. Even if it's fake. (j/k)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This