by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 14th 2010 9:26am
The RIAA and the IFPI have been going on and on for years about just how ridiculous it is for people to suggest music should be "free." They will go on, at great length, to talk up the "value" of music and how it should be paid for. But, apparently, they don't think that applies to anyone else. They're apparently screaming angry at Google because Google (gasp) responded to their request to provide them tools to help them track down unauthorized copies, by quoting their standard prices for how much it costs to use Google's API. So, RIAA, please explain: why is it sacrilege for you to demand people pay up, but it's even worse if Google asks you to pay to use its resources?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Bad Copyright Laws Scaring Off Necessary Investment In New Digital Platforms
- Accidentally Revealed FTC Document Details Some Questionable Google Practices, But Not The Ones Most People Focused On
- Copyright Troll Perfect 10 Ordered To Pay $5.6 Million Over Bogus Lawsuit
- Google's Ridiculous AdSense Morality Police Strike Again
- US Pressured Japan, Canada, New Zealand And Others Into Extending Copyright