by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 14th 2010 11:11pm
Michael Scott points us to a discussion noting that famed circuit court judge Richard Posner has admitted that when he recently took out a mortgage, he didn't bother reading the legal language, which leads to stories of many other lawyers admitting they don't bother reading the legal language of many of the things they sign. And yet... those things are still considered binding. I think most people realize that the language of such things will almost never actually matter, but of course, when it does matter, it really does matter. And, of course, that leads to a general question: why do we even bother with all this ridiculous legal language if no one's really agreeing to it?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- How Corporate Sovereignty Undermines Democracy By Irrevocably Binding Future Governments
- Australian ISP Promises Free Lawyers For Targets Of Copyright Trolls
- ESPN Sues Verizon For Trying To Give Consumers What They Want
- Prince Gives Away Someone Else's Artistic Efforts, Gets Sued
- Yes, Major Record Labels Are Keeping Nearly All The Money They Get From Spotify, Rather Than Giving It To Artists