by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 14th 2010 11:11pm
Michael Scott points us to a discussion noting that famed circuit court judge Richard Posner has admitted that when he recently took out a mortgage, he didn't bother reading the legal language, which leads to stories of many other lawyers admitting they don't bother reading the legal language of many of the things they sign. And yet... those things are still considered binding. I think most people realize that the language of such things will almost never actually matter, but of course, when it does matter, it really does matter. And, of course, that leads to a general question: why do we even bother with all this ridiculous legal language if no one's really agreeing to it?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Honda Tried To Get Jalopnik To Dox Commenter, Delete Posts, Meets The Streisand Effect Instead
- US Government Successfully Issues Contract For Open Source Code... For $1
- Reputation Management Bro Destroys His, And His Client's, Reputation With Threatening Phone Calls To Defense Lawyers
- Imbalanced 'Incentives' Hurt Creativity More Than They Help
- AT&T Lawyers Want You To Know That AT&T's CEO Will Never Listen To Customer Suggestions