FTC Not Interested In Giving Newspapers Antitrust Exemption

from the well,-that's-a-start dept

We were pretty nervous, earlier this year, when an FTC report with ideas on how to "save" journalism appeared to focus mainly on saving newspapers, rather than on actually saving journalism. It had a number of really troubling and potentially dangerous ideas. The FTC is now planning to release a report by the end of the year that details its proposals for helping journalism, but at least one scary suggestion appears to be off the table: granting newspapers antitrust exemptions. FTC chair Jon Leibowitz dismissed it, saying "I'm not sure that would be a good policy," and then clarified that the "government shouldn't be picking winners and losers and should be platform neutral." Hopefully the plan really does stick to that idea... though it's still not clear why the government needs to be involved in "saving journalism" in the first place.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    bob, Oct 1st, 2010 @ 12:32am

    Frankly I'm Surprised

    Surprised that part of the current US Government bureaucracy would make a comment such as, "government shouldn't be picking winners and losers and should be platform neutral."
    Especially given the types of laws that have been passed over the last 2 years where winners and losers are picked.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 1st, 2010 @ 2:36am

    Honestly, it's not clear why the govt should be involved in anti - trust suits either. It should mind its own business. Don't grant it special privileges, but don't go after it for silly reasons either. Just leave it alone (unless there is fraud involved or something).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    abc gum, Oct 1st, 2010 @ 5:23am

    Yellow journalism needs to be saved. How else would politicians smear their opponents? Have to spend those anonymous campaign contributions some where.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 1st, 2010 @ 6:09am

    Don't worry they will find ways to screw it up.
    It is what the government is good for at least in the last 20 years the had been great at it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Matthew, Oct 1st, 2010 @ 6:24am

    "it's still not clear why the government needs to be involved in "saving journalism" in the first place."

    The press is often referred to as the fourth estate. Although unofficially, it plays a role in the operation of government. I'll play the optimist here. One might regard the solvency of the press (as a whole; not individual players) as important to democracy as the continued operation of the legislature.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike42 (profile), Oct 1st, 2010 @ 8:40am

      Re:

      Yes, exactly. This is why the government is concerned with the press. The press is supposed to give transparancy and expose corruption. The only problem is, no one in the press will do anything negative anymore, because they fear losing access. Negative articles will result in certain reporters being locked out of meetings and interviews. So the value of modern journalism is questionable at best.
      By the way, please don't throw around the term, "Democracy." Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for lunch. We're a Republic for a reason.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Allan Masri (profile), Oct 1st, 2010 @ 7:39am

    Monopolies

    You guys are too much. You live in a country where monopoly interests have seized much of the wealth and are in the process of seizing the government as well, but you naively contend that the government should not try to stop them. Listen up: What benefits billionaires does not benefit you, unless you happen to be one.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 1st, 2010 @ 3:35pm

    "Hopefully the plan really does stick to that idea... though it's still not clear why the government needs to be involved in "saving journalism" in the first place."

    Journalism needs saved from newspaper industry, just as music needs saved from the recording industry.

    If the newspaper industry had it's way, it would be the only available outlet for journalism. Now replace "newspaper" with "recording" and "journalism" with "music".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This