DailyDirt: The Future Of Storage

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Storing digital data can be unreliable if you want it to last a really long time. But there are many ways to store vast amounts of data, and if you're not in a hurry to retrieve the data, it can be somewhat cheap to maintain an enormous amount of information nowadays. Here are just a few examples of storing LOTS of data in somewhat unconventional ways. If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: archive, data, dna, exabyte, gigabyte, nanoscale, printing, storage
Companies: amazon


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Wally (profile), 27 Aug 2012 @ 5:19pm

    More fun....
    http://moophz.com/article/sperm-data-storage-sds-new-way-expand-your-storage-space

    Hey Michael Ho, I have but a simple request. I would prefer at least you to do for what an article you could do since it pertains to a lot of science.

    I simply request that do an article on the late Neil Armstrong.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    RobM (profile), 27 Aug 2012 @ 5:32pm

    "This is the highest density of non-biological data ever encoded by DNA, and a gram of material could store 455 exabytes of data."

    Future Headlines:
    1 All biologically stored data Mostly Spam
    2 MPAA/RIAA claim infringement on anyone with genetic material

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    SujaOfJauhnral (profile), 27 Aug 2012 @ 5:51pm

    Re:

    I couldn't possibly think of a more inefficient storage than someone's balls. Except maybe no storage.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Wally (profile), 27 Aug 2012 @ 6:15pm

    Re: Re:

    I have yet to find how much capacity the human female egg stores.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    DogBreath, 27 Aug 2012 @ 6:33pm

    Re:

    3. Natural biological DNA replication in living beings/ non-sentient living bio-drives to start being metered and taxed by Government and the DNAAA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid Association of America.)

    Think of it as a "media tax" because you "might" use DNA to pirate copyrighted material.

    Also, If your DNA over replicates during the month (i.e. get pregnant or get cancer), you will be charged an extra fee for that process, and/or up to "termination" of you and your account (i.e. put to death by the state).

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    DogBreath, 27 Aug 2012 @ 6:53pm

    Re: Re:

    At least with two balls you can set the data storage as a Mirrored (RAID 1) array. That way if one ball fails, you still have a complete backup.

    There is still the problem of overcoming the off-site storage solution, because you are keeping all your eggs in one basket, so to speak. Just don't get kicked in the organic hard drive(s), and you (and your data) should be okay.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Rekrul, 27 Aug 2012 @ 9:36pm

    Printing at about 100,000 dots per inch in full color

    How long until governments start demanding that any printer capable of such high-density printing put a microscopic watermark on every printout so that they can be tracked?

    Or until the copyright industry starts demanding that they build in some kind of mechanism that magically detects copyrighted images and refuses to print them?

    Or until they inevitably get sued for patent infringement by a company that has never actually created anything, but which holds the patent on some trivially simple process that their printing method uses?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. icon
    Wally (profile), 27 Aug 2012 @ 9:51pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    DogBreath, I just thought upon what you said :-)

    I think in order to set up a RAID1 Array, conception would have to take place, and then another 21 years and 9 months to completely format the hard disk.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 27 Aug 2012 @ 10:37pm

    Re:

    Wally,

    I personally don't have much to say about the passing of Neil Armstrong, but for you, I'll see if I can collect a few relevant links...

    Mike

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    Wally (profile), 27 Aug 2012 @ 11:13pm

    Re: Re:

    Thanks Michael :-) It means a lot. Might I suggest stuff about lunar exploration ?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    Beta (profile), 28 Aug 2012 @ 7:26am

    Re: Re:

    Well, they're more likely to find a way to stop the growth of cancer than to stop piracy, so let's give 'em a chance.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. icon
    Beta (profile), 28 Aug 2012 @ 7:34am

    it's what the nerds wanted all along

    Now we just need a complete physical description of Lenna stored on DNA, and a 3D printer that can synthesize human-size living organisms...

    Wait... Lenna had her complete specs stored on DNA. And she was capable of synthesizing human beings. I have to rethink this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Sponsored Promotion
Public Money, Public Code - Sign The Open Letter at publiccode.eu
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.