IHOP Sues IHOP; Trademark Battle Pits Pancakes vs. God
from the rooty-tooty-fresh-'n'-godly dept
Via Consumerist, we learn that the International House of Pancakes, better known as IHOP to many, is
suing a megachurch that goes by the name International House of Prayer -- and also known as IHOP. IHOP (the restaurant) does have a whole bunch of trademarks on the IHOP name, but those are supposed to be limited to restaurants and such. To deal with that, IHOP (food) is claiming that IHOP (church) is serving food at some of its locations -- though it's difficult to believe that anyone is confusing their Rooty Tooty Fresh 'n' Fruity breakfast meal with saying a prayer (even if some may claim an IHOP breakfast can be a form of religious experience). Of course, IHOP (food) is claiming "dilution," which has become popular these days, despite the troubling implications of dilution as a trademark concept. It does seem likely that IHOP (church) did come up with its name based on IHOP (food), but is that really so bad? Or do we just assume that people are too clueless to recognize the difference?
Filed Under: trademark
Companies: ihop
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Correction
Please keep in mind that in the Old Testament, burnt offerings and sacrifices represented surrender and repentance. But in the New Testament, through Jesus Christ (because He was the ultimate PERFECT sacrifice by giving up His life) it is not necessary to LITERALLY bring burnt offerings and animal sacrifices to the altar anymore because OF (correction) the new covenant in Jesus.
Add Your Comment