When talking about the importance of Section 230 safe harbors, one thing I've seen multiple people declare is that if a site earns money directly from content on a site, such safe harbors no longer apply. However, a recent court ruling points out this is simply not true. The case involved New Jersey's attorney general suing an online ticket reseller
because some of the site's users had offered concert tickets for a Bruce Springsteen show before they were even available. But rather than going after the folks who actually posted/sold the tickets, the focus was on the site, TicketNetwork, which is operated by CheapTickes and branded by Orbitz. One of the arguments used against the site, was that since it made money on every transaction, safe harbors like Section 230 do not apply. Thankfully, the court rejected that:
The fact that the defendants charge "service" or "administrative" fees is irrelevant to the CDA analysis. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from "advertising and selling concert tickets to consumers without actually having those tickets in their possession or control." This conduct, however, conduct [sic] fits squarely within the CDA's purview.
Nice to see a court get things like this right. As Eric Goldman notes above, it's especially surprising, because courts rarely side against the government in so-called "consumer protection"-type lawsuits, such as this one.