by Mike Masnick
Fri, Sep 10th 2010 3:36pm
You don't see this one every day. A lawyer is suing the opposing lawyer in a high profile controversial case about a teenaged runaway, claiming that the opposing lawyer defamed him, by saying in a TV interview that he was "unqualified" and "that he has terrorist ties." While the latter clearly could be defamatory (the former might be... but seems more like a statement of opinion, not fact), it does make you wonder if such a lawsuit really is effective in preventing "damage to his reputation." I would think that most people would recognize the statements in context, rather than automatically assuming they were true.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Nixes PS3 Linux Class Action Settlement As Class's Lawyers Victimize The Class A Second Time
- Australian Guy Demands Techdirt Story Be Blocked In Australia Over Comments
- Court Tells Melania Trump She Can't Sue The Daily Mail In Maryland, So She Refiles In New York
- Recent Law School Grad Sues Twitter Because Someone Made A Parody Twitter Account
- Legal Threats By Charles Harder & Shiva Ayyadurai Targeting More Speech