by Mike Masnick
Fri, Sep 10th 2010 3:36pm
You don't see this one every day. A lawyer is suing the opposing lawyer in a high profile controversial case about a teenaged runaway, claiming that the opposing lawyer defamed him, by saying in a TV interview that he was "unqualified" and "that he has terrorist ties." While the latter clearly could be defamatory (the former might be... but seems more like a statement of opinion, not fact), it does make you wonder if such a lawsuit really is effective in preventing "damage to his reputation." I would think that most people would recognize the statements in context, rather than automatically assuming they were true.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- European Court Asked To Overturn Ruling Saying Linking To Defamatory Content Is Defamatory
- Texas Lawmaker Wants To Decide Who's A Real Journalist, Make It Easier To Sue Them
- NY Judge Says Prior Restraint Is America's Best Defense Against Internet 'Chaos'
- More Shady Libel Lawsuits Resulting In Dubious Delisting Court Orders Uncovered
- Secret Sorority Handshakes, Questionable Lawsuits, Free Speech, The Right To Be Forgotten And Section 230