So Much For Transparency: Latest ACTA Draft Won't Be Released

from the wait-'til-it's-done dept

Last week, the reports from the ACTA negotiations in Washington DC suggested that many of the negotiators favored releasing the latest text, knowing that even if it wasn't released, it would almost certainly get leaked anyway. However, the negotiations have ended and guess what? It appears that the text will not be officially released (expect the "unofficial" release shortly...). Once again, it looks as though it was the US negotiators -- who keep insisting they're all for transparency -- that have blocked the release, perhaps once again using transparency as a bargaining chip to try to get other things they want. They don't get what they want, the document doesn't get released.

The latest reports are that this meeting closed some of the substantial gaps, and negotiators are hopeful that they'll wrap up the details next month in Japan. The reports also claim that the next version of the text that will be released will be the final "take it or leave it" version of the agreement. That's downright ridiculous. With every released or leaked draft so far, many people have pointed out serious problems with it, and how it will contradict various local laws. It's simply preposterous to hide such an agreement (especially since there will be no Congressional review of it in the US -- since it's been called an "executive agreement" in order to get around Congressional oversight) when it could have serious implications for many people around the globe. For an administration that has promised us transparency from the beginning, the ACTA negotiations have been the exact opposite. What's really disappointing is that the negotiators don't seem to care. Perhaps that's because they know that by keeping their mouths shut and giving trade groups everything they want, there are lucrative jobs waiting for them whenever they want.

Filed Under: acta, transparency


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2010 @ 5:02am

    Sack Them, Let Them Go To Their New Jobs

    If the US negotiators decline to serve the US public and instead are already working as loyal employees for their future employers, then why is the US taxpayer still paying them their salary? Sack them, appoint someone else who might at least try to serve the public. Public servants are supposed to serve the public, nobody else. If the negotiators decline to do that, then they should not get to keep their public service jobs. They are apparently eager to serve their future employers, and contemptuous of their present employer, the US taxpayer. So let them go.

    For their replacement, how about people who are not members of the US privileged class, who might be able to understand what it is like being just an ordinary citizen? How about hiring people over the age of 50? Such people are a lot harder to bribe because when they leave the government, they retire, and they do not expect to have to find another job. They also know how the world is supposed to work and how it does work, so corporate sleaze will not impress them so much.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.