Newsweek Explains Why Fashion Designers Don't Need Copyright

from the good-to-see dept

For many years, we've been troubled by the effort by some fashion designers to add a totally unnecessary copyright to fashion design. We had noted that the fashion industry was actually a great example of a creative industry that was thriving without copyrights. It's quite innovative and has a ton of competition, which is what we'd like to see -- so it never made sense that some politicians keep introducing a bill to extend copyright protection to fashion designers. This year, Sen. Chuck Schumer is back again with another attempt at extending copyright to fashion, and he's been able to sign up a large number of co-sponsors. In the past, similar proposals haven't gone far, but there's a feeling that there may be some momentum behind it this year.

Thankfully, some in the mainstream press are calling foul. Over at Newsweek, Ezra Klein has a fantastic column questioning the need for this bill and highlighting just how ridiculous it is. My favorite part is the following:
But perhaps the strongest argument is that America's apparel industry doesn't seem broken--so why try and fix it? "America is the world fashion leader," said Steven Kolb, director of the Council of Fashion Designers of America, the lead trade group in support of the Schumer bill, "and yet it is basically the only industrialized country that does not provide protection for fashion design."

Run that by me one more time? We're the world leader in fashion, so we should change our policy to mimic our lagging competitors?
Klein quotes Jamie Boyle, pointing out that:
"Intellectual property is legalized monopoly," says James Boyle, a professor at Duke Law School. "And like any monopoly, its tendency is to raise prices and diminish availability. We should have a high burden of proof for whether it's necessary."
Indeed. The supporters of this bill don't seem to realize that copyright is supposed to be about "promoting the progress," not about "protecting an industry." The comments from Steven Kolb show that fashion designers want this not to promote the progress, but because they feel blatantly entitled to extra protectionism. Yet, as Boyle points out, this can seriously harm the public. There should be a high burden of proof to show that any such expansion of copyright law is necessary, and the evidence (as even Kolb implicitly admits) is totally lacking.

Filed Under: chuck schumer, copyright, fashion industry

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    darryl, 23 Aug 2010 @ 9:50pm

    The choice is for the creators, not the leaches. want choice?, create !!

    what I said was the CREATOR of the material has a choice to copyright his works or to place his works in the public domain. That is HIS choice.

    If you did not create it, you dont get that choice.

    So if the fashion industry believes it does not need copyright, they dont have to enforce copyright. It is their choice.

    Ofcourse, you do not have that choice, if you want to use someone elses design, UNLESS that person says you can by placing it in the public domain and not giving up any rights to his works.

    I know you are complaining from a consumer point of view, where you want everything. No matter what the creater wants you expect to be able to do with that what you like.

    When that is the case, the creators seek other methods to protect their creations, the main one the fashion industry uses is secrecy.

    So you dont get a choice, you dont get to copy because you dont get to see.

    Especially in the fashion industry when products are highly time critical, that means this seasons fashions are hot sellers and that is why fashion designers dont make their designs available until release.

    Too late for the copyiers to take advantage of it.

    So we can have what we have today, and that is secrecy, and not being able to copy, because they keep their design a close secret.

    Or you can allow copyright laws so they can be less secret, and then have some ability to publish early works, or mabey guilde the market, create a trend.
    And give some other manufacturers some chance of riding the same fashion movement with cheaper products, under license.

    That way the entire market benefits, as does consumers.

    In this case copyright laws would make those designs more available, and far less secret as they are now.

    And if you are a fashion designer who hates secrecy and copyright, place your designes in the public domain..

    See how well that works for you.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.