by Mike Masnick
Fri, Aug 20th 2010 4:14pm
We recently wrote about the LA Times being barred by a judge from publishing a photo of murder suspect Alberd Tersargyan that was taken -- with permission -- in the courtroom. As pretty much every legal expert who commented on the case noted, there was almost no way the judge's ban would hold up under a First Amendment review, as it was clear prior restraint. And, indeed, it didn't take long for an appeals court to overturn the ruling and note that it was, indeed, prior restraint. The First Amendment wins again...
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- NYPD Claims It Can't Find 'Widely-Circulated' Memo That Cut Off Press Access To Precinct Crime Blotters
- Following Canada's Bad Example, Now UK Wants To Muzzle Scientists And Their Inconvenient Truths
- Google's Ridiculous AdSense Morality Police Strike Again
- Attorney General Threatens To Prosecute Reporters For Doing Their Job
- Indian Supreme Court Strikes Down Censorship Law -- But Leaves Web Blocking