by Mike Masnick
Fri, Aug 20th 2010 4:14pm
We recently wrote about the LA Times being barred by a judge from publishing a photo of murder suspect Alberd Tersargyan that was taken -- with permission -- in the courtroom. As pretty much every legal expert who commented on the case noted, there was almost no way the judge's ban would hold up under a First Amendment review, as it was clear prior restraint. And, indeed, it didn't take long for an appeals court to overturn the ruling and note that it was, indeed, prior restraint. The First Amendment wins again...
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Sting Operation Shows How Full Of Crap Health Journals Are When It Comes To Dietary Studies
- Washington State Says Its Anti-SLAPP Law Is Unconstitutional
- Insanity Rules In Ireland: Media Ordered Not To Report On Parliamentary Speech
- Ford Pretends To Open Up Its Patents Like Tesla, But Doesn't; Media Falls For It
- Rockstar Ironically Goes On The Trademark Muscle To Silence BBC Documentary