by Mike Masnick
Thu, Aug 12th 2010 6:06am
It seems that judges are becoming less and less concerned with the First Amendment lately. Apparently, a California judge barred the LA Times from publishing a photo it took of murder suspect Alberd Tersargyan. The judge had initially allowed a photographer from the LA Times to snap some photos of Tersargyan during a pretrial proceeding. However, his lawyers protested that these photos could take away his right to a fair trial... and the judge agreed. The newspaper appealed, and now a California appeals court has held off ruling on the issue for at least a week. The LA Times, for obvious reasons, finds this troubling. This isn't the first time we've seen similar things either. Last year, in New York, a judge considered barring a newspaper from showing photos of a local politician in handcuffs, saying it might bias the jury. However, previous First Amendment rulings seem to make it pretty clear that publishing such photos is perfectly legal.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Chickenshit American Bar Association Scared Out Of Publishing Report Calling Trump A Libel Bully
- Zuckerberg Momentarily Curbs 'Hate Speech' Moderation Stupidity At Facebook To Reinstate Posts By Donald Trump
- Just How Wise Is It When Marco Rubio Promises To Swear Off Factual Information From Wikileaks?
- How One Young Black Man Supporting Trump Massively Skews The LA Times Presidential Poll
- Programming The News: The Future Of Reporting Is Algorithms