by Mike Masnick
Wed, Aug 11th 2010 9:08pm
With the news that a lawsuit has been filed against T-Mobile for advertising "unlimited" smartphone data service that's really limited to 10GB, it raises an important question: how come we don't see more lawsuits like this? For years we've pointed out that all these services marketing offerings as "unlimited" when they're really limited certainly must be violating truth in advertising laws -- but for some reason, you almost never hear of any actual lawsuits against these companies. Now, it's probably difficult to show that the difference caused much harm, but you would think that, at the very least, the FTC would step in at some point to point out that calling a limited service "unlimited," is not allowed.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- How Is This Not A Net Neutrality Violation, Sprint?
- T-Mobile, Sprint Tap Dance Over, Under, And Around Net Neutrality
- Just As We Warned: A Chinese Tech Giant Goes On The Patent Attack -- In East Texas
- T-Mobile CEO Vows To Hunt Down 'Thieves' And 'Clever Hackers' That 'Abuse' Company's Unlimited Data Plans
- Verizon Quietly Backs Off Throttling 'Unlimited' Wireless Customers, But Only After It No Longer Matters