by Mike Masnick
Wed, Aug 4th 2010 3:50pm
A few months back, we wrote about a Canadian woman suing her mobile phone provider, Rogers, for automatically consolidating household bills, which revealed to her husband an affair she was having and coordinating via her mobile phone (which had been under her own account). Broadband Reports points us to a similar story of a police chief in Pennsylvania who is suing AT&T for revealing his phone call records to his wife. She apparently got upset that he was talking to an ex-girlfriend. The police chief claims his calls were about a criminal investigation, but when his wife asked about the calls, he denied ever contacting his ex-girlfriend. But then his wife got more upset about him lying, because AT&T had already revealed his call records to her. She wasn't named on the account, so AT&T sharing the information seems pretty bad. And, from the few details shared, it sounds like he's actually accusing AT&T of going further than just providing his phone records: apparently "the [AT&T] representative conducted a number search on his records, in order for her to confirm her suspicions that he was communicating with this woman." And she didn't even have to send them a post-it note.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- If You're Learning About It From Slate, Running Your Own Email Server Is A Horrendously Bad Idea
- Baltimore PD Can Keep Tabs On The Entire City, Thanks To Privately-Donated Aerial Surveillance System
- One More Time With Feeling: Net Neutrality Didn't Hurt Broadband Investment In The Slightest
- The EFF Calls Out Microsoft's Ongoing Bullshit On Windows 10 Privacy Concerns
- And Just Like That, The Dumbest Trademark Suit Over Saying 'Thank You' Disappears